State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Nebraska > Chapter28 > 28-518

28-518. Grading of theftoffenses; aggregation allowed; when.(1) Theftconstitutes a Class III felony when the value of the thing involved is overone thousand five hundred dollars.(2) Theft constitutes a Class IV felony when the value ofthe thing involved is five hundred dollars or more, but not over one thousandfive hundred dollars.(3) Theft constitutes a Class I misdemeanor when the valueof the thing involved is more than two hundred dollars, but less than fivehundred dollars.(4) Theft constitutes a Class II misdemeanor when the valueof the thing involved is two hundred dollars or less.(5) For any second or subsequent conviction under subsection(3) of this section, any person so offending shall be guilty of a Class IVfelony.(6) For any second conviction under subsection (4) of thissection, any person so offending shall be guilty of a Class I misdemeanor,and for any third or subsequent conviction under subsection (4) of this section,the person so offending shall be guilty of a Class IV felony.(7) Amounts taken pursuant to one scheme or course of conductfrom one or more persons may be aggregatedin the indictment or information in determining the classification of theoffense, except that amounts may not be aggregated into more than one offense.(8) In any prosecution for theft under sections 28-509 to 28-518, value shall be an essential element of the offense that must be provedbeyond a reasonable doubt. SourceLaws 1977, LB 38, § 117; Laws 1978, LB 748, § 7; Laws 1982, LB 347, § 8; Laws 1992, LB 111, § 2; Laws 2009, LB155, § 7.AnnotationsSubsection (7) of this section permits the value of all items of property taken pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct from one person to be aggregated in order to determine the classification of the theft offense, but specifically prohibits aggregation of individual values into more than one offense. State v. Miner, 273 Neb. 837, 733 N.W.2d 891 (2007).While subsection (8) of this section now requires that intrinsic value be proved beyond a reasonable doubt as an element of the offense, proof of a specific value at the time of the theft is necessary only for gradation of the offense. State v. Gartner, 263 Neb. 153, 638 N.W.2d 849 (2002).The degree of the crime for grading purposes of this section must be measured by the value of the thing involved as obtained by defendant through deception, and the value of the thing involved as to the victim is immaterial. State v. Roche, Inc., 246 Neb. 568, 520 N.W.2d 539 (1994).An act of theft involving multiple items of property stolen simultaneously at the same place constitutes one offense, in which the value of the individual stolen items may be considered collectively for the aggregate or total value of the property stolen to determine the grade of the offense under this section. State v. Garza, 241 Neb. 256, 487 N.W.2d 551 (1992).The greater the value of the property involved in a theft, the more severe the punishment which may be imposed on conviction for the theft; and the determination of value is a question for the fact finder, whose finding will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. State v. Garza, 241 Neb. 256, 487 N.W.2d 551 (1992).In a theft charge, the value of the thing involved is an element of the charge against defendant and must be proved by the State beyond a reasonable doubt and must be established by the jury. State v. Scott, 225 Neb. 146, 403 N.W.2d 351 (1987).A conviction under subsection (2) or (3) of this section does not include a conviction of a lesser offense under subsection (4) of this section for purposes of enhancement. State v. Long, 4 Neb. App. 126, 539 N.W.2d 443 (1995).Pursuant to subsection (8) of this section, value is an essential element of the crime of theft by receiving stolen property. In re Interest of Shea B., 3 Neb. App. 750, 532 N.W.2d 52 (1995).

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Nebraska > Chapter28 > 28-518

28-518. Grading of theftoffenses; aggregation allowed; when.(1) Theftconstitutes a Class III felony when the value of the thing involved is overone thousand five hundred dollars.(2) Theft constitutes a Class IV felony when the value ofthe thing involved is five hundred dollars or more, but not over one thousandfive hundred dollars.(3) Theft constitutes a Class I misdemeanor when the valueof the thing involved is more than two hundred dollars, but less than fivehundred dollars.(4) Theft constitutes a Class II misdemeanor when the valueof the thing involved is two hundred dollars or less.(5) For any second or subsequent conviction under subsection(3) of this section, any person so offending shall be guilty of a Class IVfelony.(6) For any second conviction under subsection (4) of thissection, any person so offending shall be guilty of a Class I misdemeanor,and for any third or subsequent conviction under subsection (4) of this section,the person so offending shall be guilty of a Class IV felony.(7) Amounts taken pursuant to one scheme or course of conductfrom one or more persons may be aggregatedin the indictment or information in determining the classification of theoffense, except that amounts may not be aggregated into more than one offense.(8) In any prosecution for theft under sections 28-509 to 28-518, value shall be an essential element of the offense that must be provedbeyond a reasonable doubt. SourceLaws 1977, LB 38, § 117; Laws 1978, LB 748, § 7; Laws 1982, LB 347, § 8; Laws 1992, LB 111, § 2; Laws 2009, LB155, § 7.AnnotationsSubsection (7) of this section permits the value of all items of property taken pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct from one person to be aggregated in order to determine the classification of the theft offense, but specifically prohibits aggregation of individual values into more than one offense. State v. Miner, 273 Neb. 837, 733 N.W.2d 891 (2007).While subsection (8) of this section now requires that intrinsic value be proved beyond a reasonable doubt as an element of the offense, proof of a specific value at the time of the theft is necessary only for gradation of the offense. State v. Gartner, 263 Neb. 153, 638 N.W.2d 849 (2002).The degree of the crime for grading purposes of this section must be measured by the value of the thing involved as obtained by defendant through deception, and the value of the thing involved as to the victim is immaterial. State v. Roche, Inc., 246 Neb. 568, 520 N.W.2d 539 (1994).An act of theft involving multiple items of property stolen simultaneously at the same place constitutes one offense, in which the value of the individual stolen items may be considered collectively for the aggregate or total value of the property stolen to determine the grade of the offense under this section. State v. Garza, 241 Neb. 256, 487 N.W.2d 551 (1992).The greater the value of the property involved in a theft, the more severe the punishment which may be imposed on conviction for the theft; and the determination of value is a question for the fact finder, whose finding will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. State v. Garza, 241 Neb. 256, 487 N.W.2d 551 (1992).In a theft charge, the value of the thing involved is an element of the charge against defendant and must be proved by the State beyond a reasonable doubt and must be established by the jury. State v. Scott, 225 Neb. 146, 403 N.W.2d 351 (1987).A conviction under subsection (2) or (3) of this section does not include a conviction of a lesser offense under subsection (4) of this section for purposes of enhancement. State v. Long, 4 Neb. App. 126, 539 N.W.2d 443 (1995).Pursuant to subsection (8) of this section, value is an essential element of the crime of theft by receiving stolen property. In re Interest of Shea B., 3 Neb. App. 750, 532 N.W.2d 52 (1995).

State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Nebraska > Chapter28 > 28-518

28-518. Grading of theftoffenses; aggregation allowed; when.(1) Theftconstitutes a Class III felony when the value of the thing involved is overone thousand five hundred dollars.(2) Theft constitutes a Class IV felony when the value ofthe thing involved is five hundred dollars or more, but not over one thousandfive hundred dollars.(3) Theft constitutes a Class I misdemeanor when the valueof the thing involved is more than two hundred dollars, but less than fivehundred dollars.(4) Theft constitutes a Class II misdemeanor when the valueof the thing involved is two hundred dollars or less.(5) For any second or subsequent conviction under subsection(3) of this section, any person so offending shall be guilty of a Class IVfelony.(6) For any second conviction under subsection (4) of thissection, any person so offending shall be guilty of a Class I misdemeanor,and for any third or subsequent conviction under subsection (4) of this section,the person so offending shall be guilty of a Class IV felony.(7) Amounts taken pursuant to one scheme or course of conductfrom one or more persons may be aggregatedin the indictment or information in determining the classification of theoffense, except that amounts may not be aggregated into more than one offense.(8) In any prosecution for theft under sections 28-509 to 28-518, value shall be an essential element of the offense that must be provedbeyond a reasonable doubt. SourceLaws 1977, LB 38, § 117; Laws 1978, LB 748, § 7; Laws 1982, LB 347, § 8; Laws 1992, LB 111, § 2; Laws 2009, LB155, § 7.AnnotationsSubsection (7) of this section permits the value of all items of property taken pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct from one person to be aggregated in order to determine the classification of the theft offense, but specifically prohibits aggregation of individual values into more than one offense. State v. Miner, 273 Neb. 837, 733 N.W.2d 891 (2007).While subsection (8) of this section now requires that intrinsic value be proved beyond a reasonable doubt as an element of the offense, proof of a specific value at the time of the theft is necessary only for gradation of the offense. State v. Gartner, 263 Neb. 153, 638 N.W.2d 849 (2002).The degree of the crime for grading purposes of this section must be measured by the value of the thing involved as obtained by defendant through deception, and the value of the thing involved as to the victim is immaterial. State v. Roche, Inc., 246 Neb. 568, 520 N.W.2d 539 (1994).An act of theft involving multiple items of property stolen simultaneously at the same place constitutes one offense, in which the value of the individual stolen items may be considered collectively for the aggregate or total value of the property stolen to determine the grade of the offense under this section. State v. Garza, 241 Neb. 256, 487 N.W.2d 551 (1992).The greater the value of the property involved in a theft, the more severe the punishment which may be imposed on conviction for the theft; and the determination of value is a question for the fact finder, whose finding will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. State v. Garza, 241 Neb. 256, 487 N.W.2d 551 (1992).In a theft charge, the value of the thing involved is an element of the charge against defendant and must be proved by the State beyond a reasonable doubt and must be established by the jury. State v. Scott, 225 Neb. 146, 403 N.W.2d 351 (1987).A conviction under subsection (2) or (3) of this section does not include a conviction of a lesser offense under subsection (4) of this section for purposes of enhancement. State v. Long, 4 Neb. App. 126, 539 N.W.2d 443 (1995).Pursuant to subsection (8) of this section, value is an essential element of the crime of theft by receiving stolen property. In re Interest of Shea B., 3 Neb. App. 750, 532 N.W.2d 52 (1995).