State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > North-carolina > Chapter_25 > GS_25-2A-202

§25‑2A‑202.  Final written expression:  parol or extrinsic evidence.

Terms with respect to whichthe confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise setforth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of theiragreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not becontradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oralagreement but may be explained or supplemented:

(a)        by course of dealingor usage of trade or by course of performance; and

(b)        by evidence ofconsistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have beenintended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of theagreement. (1993, c. 463, s. 1.)

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > North-carolina > Chapter_25 > GS_25-2A-202

§25‑2A‑202.  Final written expression:  parol or extrinsic evidence.

Terms with respect to whichthe confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise setforth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of theiragreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not becontradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oralagreement but may be explained or supplemented:

(a)        by course of dealingor usage of trade or by course of performance; and

(b)        by evidence ofconsistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have beenintended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of theagreement. (1993, c. 463, s. 1.)


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > North-carolina > Chapter_25 > GS_25-2A-202

§25‑2A‑202.  Final written expression:  parol or extrinsic evidence.

Terms with respect to whichthe confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise setforth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of theiragreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not becontradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oralagreement but may be explained or supplemented:

(a)        by course of dealingor usage of trade or by course of performance; and

(b)        by evidence ofconsistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have beenintended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of theagreement. (1993, c. 463, s. 1.)