State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > North-carolina > Chapter_90 > GS_90-171_92

§ 90‑171.92. Dispute resolution.

If there is a dispute that cannot be resolved by the party statesinvolved, the following procedure shall be used:

(1)        The party states shall submit the issues in dispute to anarbitration panel that shall consist of an individual appointed by the Compactadministrator in the home state, an individual appointed by the Compactadministrator in the remote states involved, and an individual appointed by theCompact administrators of all the party states involved in the dispute.

(2)        The decision of a majority of the arbitrators shall be finaland binding. (1999‑245, s.1.)

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > North-carolina > Chapter_90 > GS_90-171_92

§ 90‑171.92. Dispute resolution.

If there is a dispute that cannot be resolved by the party statesinvolved, the following procedure shall be used:

(1)        The party states shall submit the issues in dispute to anarbitration panel that shall consist of an individual appointed by the Compactadministrator in the home state, an individual appointed by the Compactadministrator in the remote states involved, and an individual appointed by theCompact administrators of all the party states involved in the dispute.

(2)        The decision of a majority of the arbitrators shall be finaland binding. (1999‑245, s.1.)


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > North-carolina > Chapter_90 > GS_90-171_92

§ 90‑171.92. Dispute resolution.

If there is a dispute that cannot be resolved by the party statesinvolved, the following procedure shall be used:

(1)        The party states shall submit the issues in dispute to anarbitration panel that shall consist of an individual appointed by the Compactadministrator in the home state, an individual appointed by the Compactadministrator in the remote states involved, and an individual appointed by theCompact administrators of all the party states involved in the dispute.

(2)        The decision of a majority of the arbitrators shall be finaland binding. (1999‑245, s.1.)