Where there is an objection to a question propounded to a witness in the trial of any case and the objection is overruled, it shall not be necessary to make a motion to exclude the answer of the witness in order to put the court in error on its ruling on such objection.
(Acts 1927, No. 550, p. 636; Code 1940, T. 7, §446.)Where there is an objection to a question propounded to a witness in the trial of any case and the objection is overruled, it shall not be necessary to make a motion to exclude the answer of the witness in order to put the court in error on its ruling on such objection.
(Acts 1927, No. 550, p. 636; Code 1940, T. 7, §446.)
Where there is an objection to a question propounded to a witness in the trial of any case and the objection is overruled, it shall not be necessary to make a motion to exclude the answer of the witness in order to put the court in error on its ruling on such objection.
(Acts 1927, No. 550, p. 636; Code 1940, T. 7, §446.)