State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Minnesota > 59A-79A > 62Q > 62Q_107

62Q.107 PROHIBITED PROVISION; JUDICIAL REVIEW.

Beginning January 1, 1999, no health plan, including the coverages described in section 62A.011, subdivision 3, clauses (7) and (10), may specify a standard of review upon which a court may review denial of a claim or of any other decision made by a health plan company with respect to an enrollee. This section prohibits limiting court review to a determination of whether the health plan company's decision is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, or any other standard less favorable to the enrollee than a preponderance of the evidence.

History:

1998 c 407 art 2 s 21

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Minnesota > 59A-79A > 62Q > 62Q_107

62Q.107 PROHIBITED PROVISION; JUDICIAL REVIEW.

Beginning January 1, 1999, no health plan, including the coverages described in section 62A.011, subdivision 3, clauses (7) and (10), may specify a standard of review upon which a court may review denial of a claim or of any other decision made by a health plan company with respect to an enrollee. This section prohibits limiting court review to a determination of whether the health plan company's decision is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, or any other standard less favorable to the enrollee than a preponderance of the evidence.

History:

1998 c 407 art 2 s 21


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Minnesota > 59A-79A > 62Q > 62Q_107

62Q.107 PROHIBITED PROVISION; JUDICIAL REVIEW.

Beginning January 1, 1999, no health plan, including the coverages described in section 62A.011, subdivision 3, clauses (7) and (10), may specify a standard of review upon which a court may review denial of a claim or of any other decision made by a health plan company with respect to an enrollee. This section prohibits limiting court review to a determination of whether the health plan company's decision is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, or any other standard less favorable to the enrollee than a preponderance of the evidence.

History:

1998 c 407 art 2 s 21