State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > North-carolina > Chapter_90 > GS_90-48_9

§ 90‑48.9. Immunity of witnesses before dental peer review committee.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person providinginformation to any dental peer review committee or organization shall be held,by reason of having provided such information, to have violated any criminallaw, or to be civilly liable under any law unless:

(1)        The information is unrelated to the performance of the dutyor function of the peer review committee or organization, or

(2)        The information is false, and the person providing theinformation knew, or had good reason to believe that the information was false.(1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1192,s. 1.)

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > North-carolina > Chapter_90 > GS_90-48_9

§ 90‑48.9. Immunity of witnesses before dental peer review committee.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person providinginformation to any dental peer review committee or organization shall be held,by reason of having provided such information, to have violated any criminallaw, or to be civilly liable under any law unless:

(1)        The information is unrelated to the performance of the dutyor function of the peer review committee or organization, or

(2)        The information is false, and the person providing theinformation knew, or had good reason to believe that the information was false.(1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1192,s. 1.)


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > North-carolina > Chapter_90 > GS_90-48_9

§ 90‑48.9. Immunity of witnesses before dental peer review committee.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person providinginformation to any dental peer review committee or organization shall be held,by reason of having provided such information, to have violated any criminallaw, or to be civilly liable under any law unless:

(1)        The information is unrelated to the performance of the dutyor function of the peer review committee or organization, or

(2)        The information is false, and the person providing theinformation knew, or had good reason to believe that the information was false.(1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1192,s. 1.)