State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > South-dakota > Title-23a > Chapter-26 > Statute-23a-26-12-3

23A-26-12.3. Burden of proof. In a hearing pursuant to § 23A-26-12.2, a person found not guilty only by reason of insanity of an offense involving bodily injury to, or serious damage to the property of, another person, or involving a substantial risk of such injury or damage, has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that his release would not create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage of property of another due to a present mental illness or defect. With respect to any other offense, the person has the burden of such proof by a preponderance of the evidence.

Source: SL 1985, ch 192, § 15.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > South-dakota > Title-23a > Chapter-26 > Statute-23a-26-12-3

23A-26-12.3. Burden of proof. In a hearing pursuant to § 23A-26-12.2, a person found not guilty only by reason of insanity of an offense involving bodily injury to, or serious damage to the property of, another person, or involving a substantial risk of such injury or damage, has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that his release would not create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage of property of another due to a present mental illness or defect. With respect to any other offense, the person has the burden of such proof by a preponderance of the evidence.

Source: SL 1985, ch 192, § 15.


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > South-dakota > Title-23a > Chapter-26 > Statute-23a-26-12-3

23A-26-12.3. Burden of proof. In a hearing pursuant to § 23A-26-12.2, a person found not guilty only by reason of insanity of an offense involving bodily injury to, or serious damage to the property of, another person, or involving a substantial risk of such injury or damage, has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that his release would not create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage of property of another due to a present mental illness or defect. With respect to any other offense, the person has the burden of such proof by a preponderance of the evidence.

Source: SL 1985, ch 192, § 15.