25-1307

25-1307. Contest of registration or
enforcement

A. A party contesting the validity or enforcement of a registered order or seeking
to vacate the registration has the burden of proving one or more of the following
defenses:

1. The issuing tribunal lacked personal jurisdiction over the contesting party.

2. The order was obtained by fraud.

3. The order has been vacated, suspended or modified by a later order.

4. The issuing tribunal has stayed the order pending appeal.

5. There is a defense under the law of this state to the remedy sought.

6. Full or partial payment has been made.

7. The statute of limitation applicable under section 25-1304 precludes enforcement
of some or all of the arrearages.

8. The alleged controlling order is not the controlling order.

B. If a party presents evidence establishing a full or partial defense under
subsection A of this section, a tribunal may stay enforcement of the registered order,
continue the proceeding to permit production of additional relevant evidence and issue
other appropriate orders. An uncontested portion of the registered order may be enforced
by all remedies available under the laws of this state.

C. If the contesting party does not establish a defense under subsection A of this
section to the validity or enforcement of the order, the registering tribunal shall issue
an order confirming the order.