25-408

25-408. Rights of noncustodial parent;
parenting time; relocation of child; exception; enforcement; access
to records

A. A parent who is not granted custody of the child is entitled to reasonable
parenting time rights to ensure that the minor child has frequent and continuing contact
with the noncustodial parent unless the court finds, after a hearing, that parenting time
would endanger seriously the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.

B. If by written agreement or court order both parents are entitled to custody or
parenting time and both parents reside in the state, at least sixty days' advance written
notice shall be provided to the other parent before a parent may do either of the
following:

1. Relocate the child outside the state.

2. Relocate the child more than one hundred miles within the state.

C. The notice required by this section shall be made by certified mail, return
receipt requested, or pursuant to the Arizona rules of family law procedure. The court
shall sanction a parent who, without good cause, does not comply with the notification
requirements of this subsection. The court may impose a sanction that will affect custody
or parenting time only in accordance with the child's best interests.

D. Within thirty days after notice is made the nonmoving parent may petition the
court to prevent relocation of the child. After expiration of this time any petition or
other application to prevent relocation of the child may be granted only on a showing of
good cause. This subsection does not prohibit a parent who is seeking to relocate the
child from petitioning the court for a hearing, on notice to the other parent, to
determine the appropriateness of a relocation that may adversely affect the other
parent's custody or parenting time rights.

E. Subsection B of this section does not apply if provision for relocation of a
child has been made by a court order or a written agreement of the parties that is dated
within one year of the proposed relocation of the child.

F. Pending the determination by the court of a petition or application to prevent
relocation of the child:

1. A parent with sole custody or a parent with joint custody and primary physical
custody who is required by circumstances of health or safety or employment of that parent
or that parent's spouse to relocate in less than sixty days after written notice has been
given to the other parent may temporarily relocate with the child.

2. A parent who shares joint custody and substantially equal physical custody and
who is required by circumstances of health or safety or employment of that parent or that
parent's spouse to relocate in less than sixty days after written notice has been given
to the other parent may temporarily relocate with the child only if both parents execute
a written agreement to permit relocation of the child.

G. The court shall determine whether to allow the parent to relocate the child in
accordance with the child's best interests. The burden of proving what is in the child's
best interests is on the parent who is seeking to relocate the child. To the extent
practicable the court shall also make appropriate arrangements to ensure the continuation
of a meaningful relationship between the child and both parents.

H. The court shall not deviate from a provision of any parenting plan or other
written agreement by which the parents specifically have agreed to allow or prohibit
relocation of the child unless the court finds that the provision is no longer in the
child's best interests. There is a rebuttable presumption that a provision from any
parenting plan or other written agreement is in the child's best interests.

I. In determining the child's best interests the court shall consider all relevant
factors including:

1. The factors prescribed under section 25-403.

2. Whether the relocation is being made or opposed in good faith and not to
interfere with or to frustrate the relationship between the child and the other parent or
the other parent's right of access to the child.

3. The prospective advantage of the move for improving the general quality of life
for the custodial parent or for the child.

4. The likelihood that the parent with whom the child will reside after the
relocation will comply with parenting time orders.

5. Whether the relocation will allow a realistic opportunity for parenting time
with each parent.

6. The extent to which moving or not moving will affect the emotional, physical or
developmental needs of the child.

7. The motives of the parents and the validity of the reasons given for moving or
opposing the move including the extent to which either parent may intend to gain a
financial advantage regarding continuing child support obligations.

8. The potential effect of relocation on the child's stability.

J. The court shall assess attorney fees and court costs against either parent if
the court finds that the parent has unreasonably denied, restricted or interfered with
court-ordered parenting time.

K. Pursuant to section 25-403.06, the noncustodial parent is entitled to have
access to documents and other information about the child unless the court finds that
access would endanger seriously the child's or the custodial parent's physical, mental,
moral or emotional health.