State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Mississippi > Title-9 > 5 > 9-5-95

§ 9-5-95. Court or chancellor may extend time in vacation.
 

The court or chancellor in vacation shall have power in proper cases for good cause shown to grant a reasonable enlargement of the time for the filing of an answer or answers, or of a demurrer or demurrers, and shall have power in like cases and for like cause shown to set aside decrees pro confesso and thereupon to permit the filing of answer or answers. But no such enlargement of time should be granted where the request therefor is solely for delay or is the result of inexcusable neglect on the part of the defendant or his solicitor. 
 

Sources: Codes, 1930, § 321; 1942, § 1229; Laws,  1924, ch. 151.
 

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Mississippi > Title-9 > 5 > 9-5-95

§ 9-5-95. Court or chancellor may extend time in vacation.
 

The court or chancellor in vacation shall have power in proper cases for good cause shown to grant a reasonable enlargement of the time for the filing of an answer or answers, or of a demurrer or demurrers, and shall have power in like cases and for like cause shown to set aside decrees pro confesso and thereupon to permit the filing of answer or answers. But no such enlargement of time should be granted where the request therefor is solely for delay or is the result of inexcusable neglect on the part of the defendant or his solicitor. 
 

Sources: Codes, 1930, § 321; 1942, § 1229; Laws,  1924, ch. 151.
 


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Mississippi > Title-9 > 5 > 9-5-95

§ 9-5-95. Court or chancellor may extend time in vacation.
 

The court or chancellor in vacation shall have power in proper cases for good cause shown to grant a reasonable enlargement of the time for the filing of an answer or answers, or of a demurrer or demurrers, and shall have power in like cases and for like cause shown to set aside decrees pro confesso and thereupon to permit the filing of answer or answers. But no such enlargement of time should be granted where the request therefor is solely for delay or is the result of inexcusable neglect on the part of the defendant or his solicitor. 
 

Sources: Codes, 1930, § 321; 1942, § 1229; Laws,  1924, ch. 151.