Sec. 52-228a. Appeal from order of remittitur or additur. - Connecticut Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Connecticut > Title52 > Chap900 > Sec52-228a

      Sec. 52-228a. Appeal from order of remittitur or additur. In any jury case where the court orders a decrease in the amount of the judgment or an increase in the amount of the judgment, the party aggrieved by the order of remittitur or additur may appeal as in any civil action. The appeal shall be on the issue of damages only, and judgment shall enter upon the verdict of liability and damages after the issue of damages is decided.

      (February, 1965, P.A. 605; 1972, P.A. 108, S. 10; P.A. 82-160, S. 114.)

      History: 1972 act applied provisions to cases where court orders an additur; P.A. 82-160 replaced "remittitur or additur" with "decrease in the amount of the judgment or an increase in the amount of the judgment".

      Cited. 208 C. 82. Legislature provided explicit right to appeal under this section not as replacement for the Sec. 52-228b right to reject the additur, but as alternative recourse for plaintiff. 246 C. 170. Secs. 52-228a and 52-228b are not inconsistent with one another. Id.

      Cited. 2 CA 174. Cited. 35 CA 850. A party, having accepted an additur, lacks standing to appeal from the order granting that additur. 72 CA 327. When court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff on same day she accepted additur, it essentially denied defendant opportunity to respond to additur by the deadline it previously had ordered. That denial contravenes provisions contained in Sec. 52-228b which allow parties a reasonable time in which to accept the additur. Because court rendered judgment before allowing defendant either to accept or reject the additur, court acted improperly. 93 CA 309.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Connecticut > Title52 > Chap900 > Sec52-228a

      Sec. 52-228a. Appeal from order of remittitur or additur. In any jury case where the court orders a decrease in the amount of the judgment or an increase in the amount of the judgment, the party aggrieved by the order of remittitur or additur may appeal as in any civil action. The appeal shall be on the issue of damages only, and judgment shall enter upon the verdict of liability and damages after the issue of damages is decided.

      (February, 1965, P.A. 605; 1972, P.A. 108, S. 10; P.A. 82-160, S. 114.)

      History: 1972 act applied provisions to cases where court orders an additur; P.A. 82-160 replaced "remittitur or additur" with "decrease in the amount of the judgment or an increase in the amount of the judgment".

      Cited. 208 C. 82. Legislature provided explicit right to appeal under this section not as replacement for the Sec. 52-228b right to reject the additur, but as alternative recourse for plaintiff. 246 C. 170. Secs. 52-228a and 52-228b are not inconsistent with one another. Id.

      Cited. 2 CA 174. Cited. 35 CA 850. A party, having accepted an additur, lacks standing to appeal from the order granting that additur. 72 CA 327. When court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff on same day she accepted additur, it essentially denied defendant opportunity to respond to additur by the deadline it previously had ordered. That denial contravenes provisions contained in Sec. 52-228b which allow parties a reasonable time in which to accept the additur. Because court rendered judgment before allowing defendant either to accept or reject the additur, court acted improperly. 93 CA 309.

State Codes and Statutes

Back To Homepage

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Connecticut > Title52 > Chap900 > Sec52-228a

      Sec. 52-228a. Appeal from order of remittitur or additur. In any jury case where the court orders a decrease in the amount of the judgment or an increase in the amount of the judgment, the party aggrieved by the order of remittitur or additur may appeal as in any civil action. The appeal shall be on the issue of damages only, and judgment shall enter upon the verdict of liability and damages after the issue of damages is decided.

      (February, 1965, P.A. 605; 1972, P.A. 108, S. 10; P.A. 82-160, S. 114.)

      History: 1972 act applied provisions to cases where court orders an additur; P.A. 82-160 replaced "remittitur or additur" with "decrease in the amount of the judgment or an increase in the amount of the judgment".

      Cited. 208 C. 82. Legislature provided explicit right to appeal under this section not as replacement for the Sec. 52-228b right to reject the additur, but as alternative recourse for plaintiff. 246 C. 170. Secs. 52-228a and 52-228b are not inconsistent with one another. Id.

      Cited. 2 CA 174. Cited. 35 CA 850. A party, having accepted an additur, lacks standing to appeal from the order granting that additur. 72 CA 327. When court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff on same day she accepted additur, it essentially denied defendant opportunity to respond to additur by the deadline it previously had ordered. That denial contravenes provisions contained in Sec. 52-228b which allow parties a reasonable time in which to accept the additur. Because court rendered judgment before allowing defendant either to accept or reject the additur, court acted improperly. 93 CA 309.