§702-213  Effect of absolute liability in
reducing grade of offense to violation.  Notwithstanding any other
provisions of existing law and unless a subsequent statute otherwise provides:



(1)  When absolute liability is imposed with respect
to any element of an offense defined by a statute other than this Code and a
conviction is based upon such liability, the offense constitutes a violation
except as provided in section 702-212(2); and



(2)  Although absolute liability is imposed by law
with respect to one or more of the elements of an offense defined by a statute
other than this Code, the culpable commission of the offense may be charged and
proved, in which event negligence with respect to such elements constitutes a
sufficient state of mind and the classification of the offense and the sentence
that may be imposed therefor upon conviction are determined by section 701-107
and chapter 706. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1]



 



Cross References



 



  Disposition of convicted defendants, see chapter 706.



  Grades and classes of offenses, see §701-107.



 



COMMENTARY ON §702-213



 



  As explained in prior commentary, the Code takes the position
that penal law is primarily concerned with the culpable commission of
offenses.  Absent a minimal degree of culpability - i.e., negligence as defined
in the Code - the penal law should not impose sanctions (e.g., imprisonment)
which import moral condemnation.  In such situations "the law has neither
a deterrent nor corrective nor an incapacitative function to perform."[1] 
Accordingly, §702-204 requires, subject to §702-212, culpability with respect
to the elements of penal offenses.  Section 702-212 provides that the
culpability provisions are not applicable to violations - the lowest grade of
penal offense - which result in a fine, forfeiture or other "civil"
penalty, but not in imprisonment or its equivalent.  Because of the limited
scope of the Penal Code and because of the pervasive use of penal sanction in
regulatory statutes, §702-212 also provides that the culpability requirements
are not applicable to offenses defined by statutes other than the Penal Code
when a legislative purpose to impose absolute liability plainly appears.



  Section 702-213 is a necessary concomitant to §702-212(2). 
It provides that, with the limited exception of §702-212(2), when absolute
liability is imposed by a statute other than the Penal Code, the offense shall
constitute a violation and not a crime.  Subsection (1) of this section thus
superimposes, as far as possible, the standards of the Penal Code on all penal
statutes.



  Subsection (2) provides, on the other hand, that, with
respect to penal statutes outside the Code, although absolute liability is
imposed, reducing the offenses to the status of a violation, the culpable
commission of such offenses may be charged and proved.  In such cases, the
reduction of the offense to a violation does not occur.  Negligence is treated
as sufficient culpability in cases of this kind.  Since most penal statutes
which are not a part of the Penal Code are regulatory legislation, providing
that a criminal conviction may be based on negligence does not seem overly
severe given the aims of such legislation.



 



SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTARY ON §702-213



 



  Part V of Chapter 707 of the Code, dealing with sex offenses,
should be reviewed in light of §702-213 to determine whether the Legislature,
in not requiring knowledge on the actor's part of the victim's age (when age is
a relevant attendant circumstance), intended to create an exception to the
general principle enunciated in this section.  (Cf. Supplemental Commentary on
§702-204.)



 



Case Notes



 



  Since there was no plainly appearing legislative purpose to
impose absolute liability for the county camping-without-a-permit offense
defined by the camping ordinance with respect to any element of the offense, paragraph
(1) converted the offense to a civil violation punishable by a fine,
forfeiture, or other civil penalty, unless defendants were expressly charged
pursuant to paragraph (2) with committing the offense with a negligent state of
mind.  114 H. 100 (App.), 157 P.3d 539.



 



__________



§702-213 Commentary:



 



1.  M.P.C., Tentative Draft No. 4, comments at 140 (1955).