§707-769  Defenses to extortion.  (1) 
It is a defense to a prosecution for extortion as defined by paragraph (1) of
section 707-764 that the defendant:



(a) Was unaware that the property or service was that
of another; or



(b) Believed that the defendant was entitled to the
property or services under a claim or right or that the defendant was
authorized, by the owner or by law, to obtain or exert control as the defendant
did.



(2)  If the owner of the property is the
defendant's spouse or reciprocal beneficiary, it is a defense to a prosecution
for extortion under paragraph (1) of section 707-764 that:



(a) The property which is obtained or over which
unauthorized control is exerted constitutes household belongings; and



(b) The defendant and the defendant's spouse or
reciprocal beneficiary were living together at the time of the conduct.



(3)  "Household belongings" means
furniture, personal effects, vehicles, or money or its equivalent in amounts
customarily used for household purposes, and other property usually found in
and about the common dwelling and accessible to its occupants.



(4)  It is an affirmative defense to a
prosecution for extortion as defined in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section
707-764 and as further defined by subparagraphs (e), (f), (g), and (i), that
the defendant believed the threatened accusation, penal charge, or exposure to
be true, or the proposed action of a public servant was justified, and that the
defendant's sole intention was to compel or induce the victim to give property or
services to the defendant due the defendant as restitution or indemnification
for harm done, or as compensation for property obtained or lawful services
performed, or to induce the victim to take reasonable action to prevent or to
remedy the wrong which was the subject of the threatened accusation, charge,
exposure, or action of a public servant in circumstances to which the threat
relates.



(5)  In a prosecution for extortion as defined
in paragraph (1) of section 707-764, it is not a defense that the defendant has
an interest in the property if the owner has an interest in the property to
which the defendant is not entitled. [L 1979, c 106, pt of §1; gen ch 1993; am
L 1997, c 383, §68]



 



Case Notes



 



  Defendant's attempt to obtain plaintiff's property was made
under claim of [sic] right.  855 F. Supp. 1156.



 



COMMENTARY ON §§707-764 TO 769



 



  Act 106, Session Laws 1979, established these sections as
part of a consolidation of laws pertaining to extortion wherein the Legislature
sought to make those laws simpler and more comprehensive.  The Legislature
rejected a provision making acts which caused the victim "great mental
anguish" extortion in the first degree on the grounds that such a standard
is too subjective, and would differ from one individual to the next. 
Conference Committee Report No. 43.



  Act 28, Session Laws 1993, amended §707-766 by stating the
elements of the offense of extortion in the second degree in the disjunctive,
consistent with the intent of the 1979 legislature in enacting that section,
and by making the language of that section gender neutral.  House Standing
Committee Report No. 190, Senate Standing Committee Report No. 1121.



  Act 383, Session Laws 1997, amended §707-769 to provide a
defense to prosecution for extortion to reciprocal beneficiaries.  In
establishing the status of reciprocal beneficiaries, the Act provides certain
rights and benefits, and represents a commitment to provide substantially
similar government rights to those couples who are barred by law from
marriage.  Conference Committee Report No. 2.



  Act 33, Session Laws 2001, strengthened the State's computer
crime laws by, among other things, amending §707-764 to clarify the offense of
extortion to include threatening by word or conduct to cause damage to a
computer, computer system, or computer network.  The legislature found that
society was adopting at a rapid pace, computer technology to conduct activities
of daily living.  Computer technology was being utilized not only for purposes
of business and recreation, but also for criminal activity.  Thus,
computer-related criminal activity was on the rise as society's dependence on
computers increased.  Senate Standing Committee Report No. 1508.



  Act 147, Session Laws 2008, amended §707-764 by adding a
reference to unlawfully obtaining "labor" [in paragraph (1)], and by
adding as an element of the offense of extortion, to destroy, conceal, remove,
confiscate, or possess a passport or other government identification or
immigration document of another person.  The legislature strengthened the laws
on prostitution and related offenses to deter and punish sexual exploitation of
minors, including obscenity-related activities.  Conference Committee Report
No. 38-08.



  Act 147, Session Laws 2008, amended §§707-765(1), 707-666(1),
and 707-767(1) by adding a reference to "labor" as an element of the
offenses of extortion in the first, second, and third degrees.  Conference
Committee Report No. 38-08.