19-216e.Procedure, construction
management at-risk.
Construction management at-risk project delivery procedures
shall be conducted as follows:
(a) The board shall determine the scope and level of detail required to
permit qualified construction manager or general contractors to submit
construction management at-risk proposals in accordance with the request for
proposals given the nature of the project.
(b) Prior to completion of the construction documents, or as early as the
initiation of the project, the construction manager or general contractor shall
be selected. The project design professional may be employed or retained by the
board to assist in the selection process.
(c) The county shall publish a notice of the request for qualifications
and proposals for the required project services at least 15 days prior to the
commencement of such requests in the official county newspaper and in such
other appropriate manner as may be
determined by the county.
(d) The board shall solicit proposals in a three stage qualifications
based selection process. Phase I shall be the solicitation of qualifications
and prequalifying a short list of construction
managers or general contractors to advance to phase II. Phase II shall be the
solicitation of a request for proposal for the project, and phase III shall
include an interview with each proposer to present their qualifications and
answer questions.
(1) Phase I shall require all proposers to submit a statement of
qualifications which shall include, but not be limited to:
(A) Similar project experience;
(B) experience in this type of project delivery system;
(C) references from design professionals and owners from previous projects;
(D) description of the construction manager or general contractor's project
management approach;
(E) financial statements; and
(F) bonding capacity. Firms submitting a statement of qualifications shall be
capable of providing a public works bond in accordance with K.S.A. 60-1111, and
amendments thereto, and shall present evidence of such bonding capacity to the
board with their statement of qualifications. If a
firm fails to present such evidence, such firm shall be deemed unqualified for
selection under this subsection.
(2) The board shall evaluate the qualifications
of all proposers in accordance with the instructions of the request for
qualifications. The board shall prepare a short
list containing a minimum of three and maximum of five qualified firms, which
have the best and most relevant qualifications to perform the services required
of the project, to participate in phase II of the selection process.
If the board receives qualifications from less than four proposers, all
proposers shall be invited to participate in phase II of the selection process.
The board shall have discretion to disqualify any
proposer that, in the board's opinion, lacks the
minimal qualifications required to perform the work.
(3) Phase II of the process shall be conducted as follows:
(A) Prequalified firms selected in phase I shall be given a request for
proposal. The request for proposal shall require all proposers to submit a more
in depth response including, but not be limited to:
(i) Company overview;
(ii) experience or references, or both, relative to the project under
question;
(iii) resumes of proposed project personnel;
(iv) overview of preconstruction services;
(v) overview of construction planning;
(vi) proposed safety plan;
(vii) fees, including fees for preconstruction services, fees for general
conditions, fees for overhead and profit and fees for self-performed work, if
any.
(4) Phase III shall be conducted as follows:
(A) Once all proposals have been submitted, the board shall
interview all of the proposers.
Interview presentation scores shall not account for more than 50% of the total
possible score.
(B) The board shall select the firm providing the best
value based on the proposal criteria and weighting factors utilized to
emphasize important elements of each project. All scoring criteria and
weighting factors shall be identified by the board in the request for proposal
instructions to proposers. The board shall proceed to negotiate
with and attempt to enter into contract with the firm receiving the best
total score to serve as the construction manager or general contractor for the
project.
(C) If the board determines, that it is not in the best
interest of the county to proceed with the project pursuant to the proposals
offered, the board shall reject all proposals. If all proposals
are rejected, the board may solicit new proposals using different design
criteria, budget constraints or qualifications.
(D) The contract to perform construction management at-risk services
will typically be awarded in phases; preconstruction followed by one or more
amendments for construction. The contract form will be a cost plus guaranteed
maximum price contract. All savings under the guaranteed maximum price may
return to the county as defined in the request for proposal.
(E) The board or construction manager at-risk, at the board's discretion,
shall publish a construction services bid notice as may be determined by the
county. Each construction services bid notice shall include the request for
bids and other bidding information prepared by the construction manager or
general contractor and the county. The county may allow the construction
manager or general contractor to self-perform construction services provided
the construction manager or general contractor submits a bid proposal under the
same conditions as all other competing firms. At the time for opening the bids,
the construction manager or general contractor shall evaluate the bids and
shall determine the lowest responsible bidder except in the case of
self-performed
work for which the county shall determine
the lowest responsible bidder. The construction manager or general contractor
shall enter into a contract with each firm performing the construction services
for the project. All bids will be available for public view.
19-216e.Procedure, construction
management at-risk.
Construction management at-risk project delivery procedures
shall be conducted as follows:
(a) The board shall determine the scope and level of detail required to
permit qualified construction manager or general contractors to submit
construction management at-risk proposals in accordance with the request for
proposals given the nature of the project.
(b) Prior to completion of the construction documents, or as early as the
initiation of the project, the construction manager or general contractor shall
be selected. The project design professional may be employed or retained by the
board to assist in the selection process.
(c) The county shall publish a notice of the request for qualifications
and proposals for the required project services at least 15 days prior to the
commencement of such requests in the official county newspaper and in such
other appropriate manner as may be
determined by the county.
(d) The board shall solicit proposals in a three stage qualifications
based selection process. Phase I shall be the solicitation of qualifications
and prequalifying a short list of construction
managers or general contractors to advance to phase II. Phase II shall be the
solicitation of a request for proposal for the project, and phase III shall
include an interview with each proposer to present their qualifications and
answer questions.
(1) Phase I shall require all proposers to submit a statement of
qualifications which shall include, but not be limited to:
(A) Similar project experience;
(B) experience in this type of project delivery system;
(C) references from design professionals and owners from previous projects;
(D) description of the construction manager or general contractor's project
management approach;
(E) financial statements; and
(F) bonding capacity. Firms submitting a statement of qualifications shall be
capable of providing a public works bond in accordance with K.S.A. 60-1111, and
amendments thereto, and shall present evidence of such bonding capacity to the
board with their statement of qualifications. If a
firm fails to present such evidence, such firm shall be deemed unqualified for
selection under this subsection.
(2) The board shall evaluate the qualifications
of all proposers in accordance with the instructions of the request for
qualifications. The board shall prepare a short
list containing a minimum of three and maximum of five qualified firms, which
have the best and most relevant qualifications to perform the services required
of the project, to participate in phase II of the selection process.
If the board receives qualifications from less than four proposers, all
proposers shall be invited to participate in phase II of the selection process.
The board shall have discretion to disqualify any
proposer that, in the board's opinion, lacks the
minimal qualifications required to perform the work.
(3) Phase II of the process shall be conducted as follows:
(A) Prequalified firms selected in phase I shall be given a request for
proposal. The request for proposal shall require all proposers to submit a more
in depth response including, but not be limited to:
(i) Company overview;
(ii) experience or references, or both, relative to the project under
question;
(iii) resumes of proposed project personnel;
(iv) overview of preconstruction services;
(v) overview of construction planning;
(vi) proposed safety plan;
(vii) fees, including fees for preconstruction services, fees for general
conditions, fees for overhead and profit and fees for self-performed work, if
any.
(4) Phase III shall be conducted as follows:
(A) Once all proposals have been submitted, the board shall
interview all of the proposers.
Interview presentation scores shall not account for more than 50% of the total
possible score.
(B) The board shall select the firm providing the best
value based on the proposal criteria and weighting factors utilized to
emphasize important elements of each project. All scoring criteria and
weighting factors shall be identified by the board in the request for proposal
instructions to proposers. The board shall proceed to negotiate
with and attempt to enter into contract with the firm receiving the best
total score to serve as the construction manager or general contractor for the
project.
(C) If the board determines, that it is not in the best
interest of the county to proceed with the project pursuant to the proposals
offered, the board shall reject all proposals. If all proposals
are rejected, the board may solicit new proposals using different design
criteria, budget constraints or qualifications.
(D) The contract to perform construction management at-risk services
will typically be awarded in phases; preconstruction followed by one or more
amendments for construction. The contract form will be a cost plus guaranteed
maximum price contract. All savings under the guaranteed maximum price may
return to the county as defined in the request for proposal.
(E) The board or construction manager at-risk, at the board's discretion,
shall publish a construction services bid notice as may be determined by the
county. Each construction services bid notice shall include the request for
bids and other bidding information prepared by the construction manager or
general contractor and the county. The county may allow the construction
manager or general contractor to self-perform construction services provided
the construction manager or general contractor submits a bid proposal under the
same conditions as all other competing firms. At the time for opening the bids,
the construction manager or general contractor shall evaluate the bids and
shall determine the lowest responsible bidder except in the case of
self-performed
work for which the county shall determine
the lowest responsible bidder. The construction manager or general contractor
shall enter into a contract with each firm performing the construction services
for the project. All bids will be available for public view.
19-216e.Procedure, construction
management at-risk.
Construction management at-risk project delivery procedures
shall be conducted as follows:
(a) The board shall determine the scope and level of detail required to
permit qualified construction manager or general contractors to submit
construction management at-risk proposals in accordance with the request for
proposals given the nature of the project.
(b) Prior to completion of the construction documents, or as early as the
initiation of the project, the construction manager or general contractor shall
be selected. The project design professional may be employed or retained by the
board to assist in the selection process.
(c) The county shall publish a notice of the request for qualifications
and proposals for the required project services at least 15 days prior to the
commencement of such requests in the official county newspaper and in such
other appropriate manner as may be
determined by the county.
(d) The board shall solicit proposals in a three stage qualifications
based selection process. Phase I shall be the solicitation of qualifications
and prequalifying a short list of construction
managers or general contractors to advance to phase II. Phase II shall be the
solicitation of a request for proposal for the project, and phase III shall
include an interview with each proposer to present their qualifications and
answer questions.
(1) Phase I shall require all proposers to submit a statement of
qualifications which shall include, but not be limited to:
(A) Similar project experience;
(B) experience in this type of project delivery system;
(C) references from design professionals and owners from previous projects;
(D) description of the construction manager or general contractor's project
management approach;
(E) financial statements; and
(F) bonding capacity. Firms submitting a statement of qualifications shall be
capable of providing a public works bond in accordance with K.S.A. 60-1111, and
amendments thereto, and shall present evidence of such bonding capacity to the
board with their statement of qualifications. If a
firm fails to present such evidence, such firm shall be deemed unqualified for
selection under this subsection.
(2) The board shall evaluate the qualifications
of all proposers in accordance with the instructions of the request for
qualifications. The board shall prepare a short
list containing a minimum of three and maximum of five qualified firms, which
have the best and most relevant qualifications to perform the services required
of the project, to participate in phase II of the selection process.
If the board receives qualifications from less than four proposers, all
proposers shall be invited to participate in phase II of the selection process.
The board shall have discretion to disqualify any
proposer that, in the board's opinion, lacks the
minimal qualifications required to perform the work.
(3) Phase II of the process shall be conducted as follows:
(A) Prequalified firms selected in phase I shall be given a request for
proposal. The request for proposal shall require all proposers to submit a more
in depth response including, but not be limited to:
(i) Company overview;
(ii) experience or references, or both, relative to the project under
question;
(iii) resumes of proposed project personnel;
(iv) overview of preconstruction services;
(v) overview of construction planning;
(vi) proposed safety plan;
(vii) fees, including fees for preconstruction services, fees for general
conditions, fees for overhead and profit and fees for self-performed work, if
any.
(4) Phase III shall be conducted as follows:
(A) Once all proposals have been submitted, the board shall
interview all of the proposers.
Interview presentation scores shall not account for more than 50% of the total
possible score.
(B) The board shall select the firm providing the best
value based on the proposal criteria and weighting factors utilized to
emphasize important elements of each project. All scoring criteria and
weighting factors shall be identified by the board in the request for proposal
instructions to proposers. The board shall proceed to negotiate
with and attempt to enter into contract with the firm receiving the best
total score to serve as the construction manager or general contractor for the
project.
(C) If the board determines, that it is not in the best
interest of the county to proceed with the project pursuant to the proposals
offered, the board shall reject all proposals. If all proposals
are rejected, the board may solicit new proposals using different design
criteria, budget constraints or qualifications.
(D) The contract to perform construction management at-risk services
will typically be awarded in phases; preconstruction followed by one or more
amendments for construction. The contract form will be a cost plus guaranteed
maximum price contract. All savings under the guaranteed maximum price may
return to the county as defined in the request for proposal.
(E) The board or construction manager at-risk, at the board's discretion,
shall publish a construction services bid notice as may be determined by the
county. Each construction services bid notice shall include the request for
bids and other bidding information prepared by the construction manager or
general contractor and the county. The county may allow the construction
manager or general contractor to self-perform construction services provided
the construction manager or general contractor submits a bid proposal under the
same conditions as all other competing firms. At the time for opening the bids,
the construction manager or general contractor shall evaluate the bids and
shall determine the lowest responsible bidder except in the case of
self-performed
work for which the county shall determine
the lowest responsible bidder. The construction manager or general contractor
shall enter into a contract with each firm performing the construction services
for the project. All bids will be available for public view.