19-216f.Procedure; building
design-build projects.
Building design-build project delivery procedures shall be
conducted as follows:
(a) The board shall determine the scope and level of detail required to
permit qualified persons to submit building design-build qualifications and
proposals in
accordance with the county requirements given the nature of the project.
(b) The board shall solicit proposals in a three-stage process. Phase I shall
be the solicitation of qualifications of the building design-build team. Phase
II shall be the solicitation of a technical proposal including conceptual
design for the project. Phase III shall be the proposal of the construction
cost.
(1) The board shall review the submittals of the proposers and assign points
to each proposal as prescribed in the instructions of the request for proposal.
(2) Notice of requests for qualifications shall be advertised and published
in the official county newspaper. Notification to include a description of the
project and the procedures for submittal.
(3) The board shall establish in the request for qualifications a time, place
and other specific instructions for the receipt of qualifications.
Qualifications not submitted in strict accordance with such instructions shall
be subject to rejection.
(4) A request for qualifications shall be prepared for each building
design-build contract containing at minimum the procedures to be followed for
each of the three phases in the process for submitting proposals, the criteria
for evaluation of proposals and their relative weight and the procedures for
making awards.
(c) Phase I shall require all proposers to submit a statement of
qualifications which shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) Demonstrated ability to perform projects comparable in design, scope and
complexity.
(2) References of owners for whom building design-build projects have been
performed.
(3) Qualifications of personnel who will manage the design and construction
aspects of the project.
(4) The names and qualifications of the primary design consultants and
contractors with whom the building design-builder proposes to subcontract. The
building design-builder may not replace an identified subcontractor or
subconsultant without the written approval of the board.
(5) Firms submitting a statement of qualifications shall be capable of
providing a public works bond in accordance with K.S.A. 60-1111, and amendments
thereto, and shall present evidence of such bonding capability to the board
with their statement of qualifications. If a firm
fails to present such evidence, such firm shall be deemed unqualified for
selection under this subsection.
(d) The board shall evaluate the qualifications
of all proposers in accordance with the instructions prescribed in the request
for qualifications.
A short list of qualified proposers
selected by the evaluation team may proceed to phase II of the selection
process. Proposers lacking the necessary qualifications to perform the work
shall be disqualified and shall not proceed to phase II of the process. Under
no circumstances shall price or fees be considered as a part of the
prequalification criteria. Points assigned in the phase I evaluation process
shall not carry forward to phase II of the process. All qualified proposers
shall be ranked on points given in phases II and III only. The two-phase
evaluation and scoring process shall be combined to determine the greatest
value to the county.
(e) The board shall prepare a short list
containing a minimum of three, but no more than the top five qualified
proposers to participate in phase II of the process.
If less than four proposers respond, all proposers shall be invited to
participate in phase II of the selection process.
(f) Phase II of the process shall be conducted as follows:
(1) The remaining project requirements will be provided to the short listed
proposer to include the following:
(A) The terms and conditions for the building design-build contract.
(B) The design criteria package.
(C) A description of the drawings, specifications or other information to be
submitted with the proposal, with guidance as to the form and level of
completeness of the drawings, specifications or other information that will be
acceptable.
(D) A schedule for planned commencement and completion of the building
design-build contract.
(E) Budget limits for the building design-build contract, if any.
(F) Requirements, including any available ratings for performance bonds,
payment bonds and insurance.
(G) Any other information that the county at its discretion chooses to
supply, including without limitation, surveys, soil reports, drawings of
existing structures, environmental studies, photographs or references to public
records.
(2) Proposers shall submit their design for the project to the level of
detail required in the request for proposal. The design proposal should
demonstrate compliance with the requirements set out in the request for
proposal.
(3) The technical proposal may contain certain limited references to
specific elements of the cost.
(4) The technical submittals shall be evaluated and assigned points in
accordance with the requirements of the request for proposal.
(g) Phase III shall be conducted as follows:
(1) The phase III proposal shall provide a firm fixed cost of design and
construction.
The proposal shall be accompanied by bid security and any other submittals as
required by the request for proposal.
(2) The proposed contract time, in calendar days, for completing a project as
designed by a proposer may be considered as an element of evaluation in phase
III. In the event the request for proposal shall establish
the assignment of value of contract time in the selection process.
(3) Phase III proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the
instructions of the request for proposal. Failure to submit a cost proposal on
time shall be cause to reject the proposal.
(h) Proposals for phase II and III shall be submitted concurrently at
the time and place specified in the request for proposal. The phase III cost
proposals shall be opened only after the phase II technical proposals have been
evaluated and assigned points.
(i) Phase III cost and schedule, which shall prescribe the number
of calendar days, proposals shall be opened and read aloud at the time and
place specified in the request for proposal. At the same time and place, the
evaluation team shall make public its scoring of phase II. Phase III shall
be evaluated in accordance with the requirements of the request for proposal.
In evaluating the proposals and determining the successful proposer, each
proposers' score shall be determined
in a quantifiable and objective manner described in the request for proposal in
combination of the points earned in both phase II and phase III.
(j) The successful responsive proposer shall be
awarded the contract. If the board determines, that it is not in the best
interest of the county to proceed with the project pursuant to the proposal
offered by the successful proposer the board shall
reject all proposals.
If the determination to reject all proposals is made for the convenience of the
board, the successful and responsive proposer shall receive twice the stipend
pursuant to subsection (g)(8) of this section and amendments thereto, of this
act, and all other responsive proposers shall receive an amount equal to such
stipend. If the determination is made to reject all proposals as a result of
proposals exceeding the budget published in the request for proposals or
otherwise not complying with the request for proposal, the board need not remit
a stipend to the proposers.
(k) If all proposals are rejected, the board may solicit
new proposals using different design criteria, budget constraints or
qualifications.
(l) As an inducement to qualified proposers, the board shall pay a stipend,
the amount of which shall be established in the request for proposal, to each
prequalified building design-builder whose proposal is responsive but not
accepted. Upon payment of the stipend to any unsuccessful building design-build
proposer, the county shall acquire a nonexclusive right to use the design
submitted by the proposer, and the proposer shall have no further liability for
its use by the county in any manner. If the building design-build proposer
desires to retain all rights and interest in the design proposed, the proposer
shall forfeit the stipend.
19-216f.Procedure; building
design-build projects.
Building design-build project delivery procedures shall be
conducted as follows:
(a) The board shall determine the scope and level of detail required to
permit qualified persons to submit building design-build qualifications and
proposals in
accordance with the county requirements given the nature of the project.
(b) The board shall solicit proposals in a three-stage process. Phase I shall
be the solicitation of qualifications of the building design-build team. Phase
II shall be the solicitation of a technical proposal including conceptual
design for the project. Phase III shall be the proposal of the construction
cost.
(1) The board shall review the submittals of the proposers and assign points
to each proposal as prescribed in the instructions of the request for proposal.
(2) Notice of requests for qualifications shall be advertised and published
in the official county newspaper. Notification to include a description of the
project and the procedures for submittal.
(3) The board shall establish in the request for qualifications a time, place
and other specific instructions for the receipt of qualifications.
Qualifications not submitted in strict accordance with such instructions shall
be subject to rejection.
(4) A request for qualifications shall be prepared for each building
design-build contract containing at minimum the procedures to be followed for
each of the three phases in the process for submitting proposals, the criteria
for evaluation of proposals and their relative weight and the procedures for
making awards.
(c) Phase I shall require all proposers to submit a statement of
qualifications which shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) Demonstrated ability to perform projects comparable in design, scope and
complexity.
(2) References of owners for whom building design-build projects have been
performed.
(3) Qualifications of personnel who will manage the design and construction
aspects of the project.
(4) The names and qualifications of the primary design consultants and
contractors with whom the building design-builder proposes to subcontract. The
building design-builder may not replace an identified subcontractor or
subconsultant without the written approval of the board.
(5) Firms submitting a statement of qualifications shall be capable of
providing a public works bond in accordance with K.S.A. 60-1111, and amendments
thereto, and shall present evidence of such bonding capability to the board
with their statement of qualifications. If a firm
fails to present such evidence, such firm shall be deemed unqualified for
selection under this subsection.
(d) The board shall evaluate the qualifications
of all proposers in accordance with the instructions prescribed in the request
for qualifications.
A short list of qualified proposers
selected by the evaluation team may proceed to phase II of the selection
process. Proposers lacking the necessary qualifications to perform the work
shall be disqualified and shall not proceed to phase II of the process. Under
no circumstances shall price or fees be considered as a part of the
prequalification criteria. Points assigned in the phase I evaluation process
shall not carry forward to phase II of the process. All qualified proposers
shall be ranked on points given in phases II and III only. The two-phase
evaluation and scoring process shall be combined to determine the greatest
value to the county.
(e) The board shall prepare a short list
containing a minimum of three, but no more than the top five qualified
proposers to participate in phase II of the process.
If less than four proposers respond, all proposers shall be invited to
participate in phase II of the selection process.
(f) Phase II of the process shall be conducted as follows:
(1) The remaining project requirements will be provided to the short listed
proposer to include the following:
(A) The terms and conditions for the building design-build contract.
(B) The design criteria package.
(C) A description of the drawings, specifications or other information to be
submitted with the proposal, with guidance as to the form and level of
completeness of the drawings, specifications or other information that will be
acceptable.
(D) A schedule for planned commencement and completion of the building
design-build contract.
(E) Budget limits for the building design-build contract, if any.
(F) Requirements, including any available ratings for performance bonds,
payment bonds and insurance.
(G) Any other information that the county at its discretion chooses to
supply, including without limitation, surveys, soil reports, drawings of
existing structures, environmental studies, photographs or references to public
records.
(2) Proposers shall submit their design for the project to the level of
detail required in the request for proposal. The design proposal should
demonstrate compliance with the requirements set out in the request for
proposal.
(3) The technical proposal may contain certain limited references to
specific elements of the cost.
(4) The technical submittals shall be evaluated and assigned points in
accordance with the requirements of the request for proposal.
(g) Phase III shall be conducted as follows:
(1) The phase III proposal shall provide a firm fixed cost of design and
construction.
The proposal shall be accompanied by bid security and any other submittals as
required by the request for proposal.
(2) The proposed contract time, in calendar days, for completing a project as
designed by a proposer may be considered as an element of evaluation in phase
III. In the event the request for proposal shall establish
the assignment of value of contract time in the selection process.
(3) Phase III proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the
instructions of the request for proposal. Failure to submit a cost proposal on
time shall be cause to reject the proposal.
(h) Proposals for phase II and III shall be submitted concurrently at
the time and place specified in the request for proposal. The phase III cost
proposals shall be opened only after the phase II technical proposals have been
evaluated and assigned points.
(i) Phase III cost and schedule, which shall prescribe the number
of calendar days, proposals shall be opened and read aloud at the time and
place specified in the request for proposal. At the same time and place, the
evaluation team shall make public its scoring of phase II. Phase III shall
be evaluated in accordance with the requirements of the request for proposal.
In evaluating the proposals and determining the successful proposer, each
proposers' score shall be determined
in a quantifiable and objective manner described in the request for proposal in
combination of the points earned in both phase II and phase III.
(j) The successful responsive proposer shall be
awarded the contract. If the board determines, that it is not in the best
interest of the county to proceed with the project pursuant to the proposal
offered by the successful proposer the board shall
reject all proposals.
If the determination to reject all proposals is made for the convenience of the
board, the successful and responsive proposer shall receive twice the stipend
pursuant to subsection (g)(8) of this section and amendments thereto, of this
act, and all other responsive proposers shall receive an amount equal to such
stipend. If the determination is made to reject all proposals as a result of
proposals exceeding the budget published in the request for proposals or
otherwise not complying with the request for proposal, the board need not remit
a stipend to the proposers.
(k) If all proposals are rejected, the board may solicit
new proposals using different design criteria, budget constraints or
qualifications.
(l) As an inducement to qualified proposers, the board shall pay a stipend,
the amount of which shall be established in the request for proposal, to each
prequalified building design-builder whose proposal is responsive but not
accepted. Upon payment of the stipend to any unsuccessful building design-build
proposer, the county shall acquire a nonexclusive right to use the design
submitted by the proposer, and the proposer shall have no further liability for
its use by the county in any manner. If the building design-build proposer
desires to retain all rights and interest in the design proposed, the proposer
shall forfeit the stipend.
19-216f.Procedure; building
design-build projects.
Building design-build project delivery procedures shall be
conducted as follows:
(a) The board shall determine the scope and level of detail required to
permit qualified persons to submit building design-build qualifications and
proposals in
accordance with the county requirements given the nature of the project.
(b) The board shall solicit proposals in a three-stage process. Phase I shall
be the solicitation of qualifications of the building design-build team. Phase
II shall be the solicitation of a technical proposal including conceptual
design for the project. Phase III shall be the proposal of the construction
cost.
(1) The board shall review the submittals of the proposers and assign points
to each proposal as prescribed in the instructions of the request for proposal.
(2) Notice of requests for qualifications shall be advertised and published
in the official county newspaper. Notification to include a description of the
project and the procedures for submittal.
(3) The board shall establish in the request for qualifications a time, place
and other specific instructions for the receipt of qualifications.
Qualifications not submitted in strict accordance with such instructions shall
be subject to rejection.
(4) A request for qualifications shall be prepared for each building
design-build contract containing at minimum the procedures to be followed for
each of the three phases in the process for submitting proposals, the criteria
for evaluation of proposals and their relative weight and the procedures for
making awards.
(c) Phase I shall require all proposers to submit a statement of
qualifications which shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) Demonstrated ability to perform projects comparable in design, scope and
complexity.
(2) References of owners for whom building design-build projects have been
performed.
(3) Qualifications of personnel who will manage the design and construction
aspects of the project.
(4) The names and qualifications of the primary design consultants and
contractors with whom the building design-builder proposes to subcontract. The
building design-builder may not replace an identified subcontractor or
subconsultant without the written approval of the board.
(5) Firms submitting a statement of qualifications shall be capable of
providing a public works bond in accordance with K.S.A. 60-1111, and amendments
thereto, and shall present evidence of such bonding capability to the board
with their statement of qualifications. If a firm
fails to present such evidence, such firm shall be deemed unqualified for
selection under this subsection.
(d) The board shall evaluate the qualifications
of all proposers in accordance with the instructions prescribed in the request
for qualifications.
A short list of qualified proposers
selected by the evaluation team may proceed to phase II of the selection
process. Proposers lacking the necessary qualifications to perform the work
shall be disqualified and shall not proceed to phase II of the process. Under
no circumstances shall price or fees be considered as a part of the
prequalification criteria. Points assigned in the phase I evaluation process
shall not carry forward to phase II of the process. All qualified proposers
shall be ranked on points given in phases II and III only. The two-phase
evaluation and scoring process shall be combined to determine the greatest
value to the county.
(e) The board shall prepare a short list
containing a minimum of three, but no more than the top five qualified
proposers to participate in phase II of the process.
If less than four proposers respond, all proposers shall be invited to
participate in phase II of the selection process.
(f) Phase II of the process shall be conducted as follows:
(1) The remaining project requirements will be provided to the short listed
proposer to include the following:
(A) The terms and conditions for the building design-build contract.
(B) The design criteria package.
(C) A description of the drawings, specifications or other information to be
submitted with the proposal, with guidance as to the form and level of
completeness of the drawings, specifications or other information that will be
acceptable.
(D) A schedule for planned commencement and completion of the building
design-build contract.
(E) Budget limits for the building design-build contract, if any.
(F) Requirements, including any available ratings for performance bonds,
payment bonds and insurance.
(G) Any other information that the county at its discretion chooses to
supply, including without limitation, surveys, soil reports, drawings of
existing structures, environmental studies, photographs or references to public
records.
(2) Proposers shall submit their design for the project to the level of
detail required in the request for proposal. The design proposal should
demonstrate compliance with the requirements set out in the request for
proposal.
(3) The technical proposal may contain certain limited references to
specific elements of the cost.
(4) The technical submittals shall be evaluated and assigned points in
accordance with the requirements of the request for proposal.
(g) Phase III shall be conducted as follows:
(1) The phase III proposal shall provide a firm fixed cost of design and
construction.
The proposal shall be accompanied by bid security and any other submittals as
required by the request for proposal.
(2) The proposed contract time, in calendar days, for completing a project as
designed by a proposer may be considered as an element of evaluation in phase
III. In the event the request for proposal shall establish
the assignment of value of contract time in the selection process.
(3) Phase III proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the
instructions of the request for proposal. Failure to submit a cost proposal on
time shall be cause to reject the proposal.
(h) Proposals for phase II and III shall be submitted concurrently at
the time and place specified in the request for proposal. The phase III cost
proposals shall be opened only after the phase II technical proposals have been
evaluated and assigned points.
(i) Phase III cost and schedule, which shall prescribe the number
of calendar days, proposals shall be opened and read aloud at the time and
place specified in the request for proposal. At the same time and place, the
evaluation team shall make public its scoring of phase II. Phase III shall
be evaluated in accordance with the requirements of the request for proposal.
In evaluating the proposals and determining the successful proposer, each
proposers' score shall be determined
in a quantifiable and objective manner described in the request for proposal in
combination of the points earned in both phase II and phase III.
(j) The successful responsive proposer shall be
awarded the contract. If the board determines, that it is not in the best
interest of the county to proceed with the project pursuant to the proposal
offered by the successful proposer the board shall
reject all proposals.
If the determination to reject all proposals is made for the convenience of the
board, the successful and responsive proposer shall receive twice the stipend
pursuant to subsection (g)(8) of this section and amendments thereto, of this
act, and all other responsive proposers shall receive an amount equal to such
stipend. If the determination is made to reject all proposals as a result of
proposals exceeding the budget published in the request for proposals or
otherwise not complying with the request for proposal, the board need not remit
a stipend to the proposers.
(k) If all proposals are rejected, the board may solicit
new proposals using different design criteria, budget constraints or
qualifications.
(l) As an inducement to qualified proposers, the board shall pay a stipend,
the amount of which shall be established in the request for proposal, to each
prequalified building design-builder whose proposal is responsive but not
accepted. Upon payment of the stipend to any unsuccessful building design-build
proposer, the county shall acquire a nonexclusive right to use the design
submitted by the proposer, and the proposer shall have no further liability for
its use by the county in any manner. If the building design-build proposer
desires to retain all rights and interest in the design proposed, the proposer
shall forfeit the stipend.
