State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Kansas > Chapter20 > Article32 > Statutes_11304

20-3203

Chapter 20.--COURTS
Article 32.--COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE

      20-3203.   Same; goals of evaluation process.On and after July 1, 2006, thegoals of the judicial performance evaluation process are:

      (a)   To improve the judicial performance of individual judges and justices andthereby improve the judiciary as a whole;

      (b)   where judges and justices are subject to retention elections, todisseminate the results from the judicial performance evaluation process toenable voters to make informed decisions about continuing judges and justicesin office; and

      (c)   to protect judicial independence while promoting public accountability ofthe judiciary.

      History:   L. 2006, ch. 195, § 3; May 25.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Kansas > Chapter20 > Article32 > Statutes_11304

20-3203

Chapter 20.--COURTS
Article 32.--COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE

      20-3203.   Same; goals of evaluation process.On and after July 1, 2006, thegoals of the judicial performance evaluation process are:

      (a)   To improve the judicial performance of individual judges and justices andthereby improve the judiciary as a whole;

      (b)   where judges and justices are subject to retention elections, todisseminate the results from the judicial performance evaluation process toenable voters to make informed decisions about continuing judges and justicesin office; and

      (c)   to protect judicial independence while promoting public accountability ofthe judiciary.

      History:   L. 2006, ch. 195, § 3; May 25.


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Kansas > Chapter20 > Article32 > Statutes_11304

20-3203

Chapter 20.--COURTS
Article 32.--COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE

      20-3203.   Same; goals of evaluation process.On and after July 1, 2006, thegoals of the judicial performance evaluation process are:

      (a)   To improve the judicial performance of individual judges and justices andthereby improve the judiciary as a whole;

      (b)   where judges and justices are subject to retention elections, todisseminate the results from the judicial performance evaluation process toenable voters to make informed decisions about continuing judges and justicesin office; and

      (c)   to protect judicial independence while promoting public accountability ofthe judiciary.

      History:   L. 2006, ch. 195, § 3; May 25.