State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Louisiana > Rs > Title15 > Rs15-85

§85.  Failure to satisfy judgment of bond forfeiture

A.  If a judgment of bond forfeiture rendered after June 22, 1993, against a commercial surety company has not been satisfied within two hundred ten days after the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value under fifty thousand dollars, or within four hundred days from mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds which have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more, nor has a suspensive appeal or other proceeding challenging the bond forfeiture been timely filed, the prosecuting attorney may file with the district court, in the parish where the bond is forfeited, a rule to show cause why that commercial surety company should not be prohibited from executing criminal bail bonds before the court issuing the judgment of bond forfeiture.

B.  At the rule to show cause, the court may consider only issues which would interrupt the enforceability of the judgment.  The court may issue an order enjoining the commercial surety company from posting criminal bail bonds before the court issuing the judgment of bond forfeiture if the judgment is not satisfied within ten days and if the court finds all of the following:

(1)  A judgment of bond forfeiture has been rendered, after June 22, 1993, against the commercial surety.

(2)  Proper notice pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 has been mailed.

(3)  No suspensive appeal has been taken.

(4)  The defendant has neither been surrendered nor appeared within one hundred eighty days of the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more, and the defendant has not been surrendered together with ten percent of the total amount of the bond more than one hundred eighty days but within two hundred seventy days after the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.

(5)  Two hundred ten days have passed since the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value under fifty thousand dollars, or four hundred days have passed since the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more.

(6)  The judgment of bond forfeiture has not been satisfied by payment of the full amount for bonds that have a face value under fifty thousand dollars, or has not been satisfied by the surrender or the appearance of the defendant together with payment in cash of ten percent of the total bond amount for bonds that have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more, if applicable.

C.  The burden of proof at the hearing shall be upon the commercial surety by a preponderance of evidence and shall be limited to documents contained in the official court record where the judgment was rendered.  The surety company may use evidence not contained in the record to show that it did not receive post-forfeiture notice or the post-forfeiture notice was not properly mailed.

Acts 1966, No. 311 §2, eff. Jan. 1, 1967.  Amended by Acts 1976, No. 579, §1; Acts 1979, No. 786, §1; Acts 1980, No. 639, §1; Acts 1982, No. 357, §1; Acts 1987, No. 728, §2; Acts 1987, No. 923, §1; Acts 1989, No. 191, §1; Acts 1990, No. 92, §1; Acts 1990, No. 520, §1; Acts 1993, No. 834, §4, eff. June 22, 1993; Acts 1994, 3rd Ex. Sess., No. 52, §3, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, No. 813, §1; Acts 1997, No. 815, §1; Acts 2001, No. 107, §1; Acts 2006, No. 466, §1, eff. June 15, 2006; Acts 2006, No. 699, §1; Acts 2006, No. 735, §1; Acts 2008, No. 415, §2, eff. Jan. 1, 2009; Acts 2010, No. 710, §2; Acts 2010, No. 914, §3.

NOTE:  Section 2 of Acts 2006, No. 699, provides that the provisions of the Act shall apply only to actions filed on or after Aug. 15, 2006.  Actions pending before Aug. 15, 2006, shall be governed by prior law.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Louisiana > Rs > Title15 > Rs15-85

§85.  Failure to satisfy judgment of bond forfeiture

A.  If a judgment of bond forfeiture rendered after June 22, 1993, against a commercial surety company has not been satisfied within two hundred ten days after the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value under fifty thousand dollars, or within four hundred days from mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds which have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more, nor has a suspensive appeal or other proceeding challenging the bond forfeiture been timely filed, the prosecuting attorney may file with the district court, in the parish where the bond is forfeited, a rule to show cause why that commercial surety company should not be prohibited from executing criminal bail bonds before the court issuing the judgment of bond forfeiture.

B.  At the rule to show cause, the court may consider only issues which would interrupt the enforceability of the judgment.  The court may issue an order enjoining the commercial surety company from posting criminal bail bonds before the court issuing the judgment of bond forfeiture if the judgment is not satisfied within ten days and if the court finds all of the following:

(1)  A judgment of bond forfeiture has been rendered, after June 22, 1993, against the commercial surety.

(2)  Proper notice pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 has been mailed.

(3)  No suspensive appeal has been taken.

(4)  The defendant has neither been surrendered nor appeared within one hundred eighty days of the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more, and the defendant has not been surrendered together with ten percent of the total amount of the bond more than one hundred eighty days but within two hundred seventy days after the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.

(5)  Two hundred ten days have passed since the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value under fifty thousand dollars, or four hundred days have passed since the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more.

(6)  The judgment of bond forfeiture has not been satisfied by payment of the full amount for bonds that have a face value under fifty thousand dollars, or has not been satisfied by the surrender or the appearance of the defendant together with payment in cash of ten percent of the total bond amount for bonds that have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more, if applicable.

C.  The burden of proof at the hearing shall be upon the commercial surety by a preponderance of evidence and shall be limited to documents contained in the official court record where the judgment was rendered.  The surety company may use evidence not contained in the record to show that it did not receive post-forfeiture notice or the post-forfeiture notice was not properly mailed.

Acts 1966, No. 311 §2, eff. Jan. 1, 1967.  Amended by Acts 1976, No. 579, §1; Acts 1979, No. 786, §1; Acts 1980, No. 639, §1; Acts 1982, No. 357, §1; Acts 1987, No. 728, §2; Acts 1987, No. 923, §1; Acts 1989, No. 191, §1; Acts 1990, No. 92, §1; Acts 1990, No. 520, §1; Acts 1993, No. 834, §4, eff. June 22, 1993; Acts 1994, 3rd Ex. Sess., No. 52, §3, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, No. 813, §1; Acts 1997, No. 815, §1; Acts 2001, No. 107, §1; Acts 2006, No. 466, §1, eff. June 15, 2006; Acts 2006, No. 699, §1; Acts 2006, No. 735, §1; Acts 2008, No. 415, §2, eff. Jan. 1, 2009; Acts 2010, No. 710, §2; Acts 2010, No. 914, §3.

NOTE:  Section 2 of Acts 2006, No. 699, provides that the provisions of the Act shall apply only to actions filed on or after Aug. 15, 2006.  Actions pending before Aug. 15, 2006, shall be governed by prior law.


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Louisiana > Rs > Title15 > Rs15-85

§85.  Failure to satisfy judgment of bond forfeiture

A.  If a judgment of bond forfeiture rendered after June 22, 1993, against a commercial surety company has not been satisfied within two hundred ten days after the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value under fifty thousand dollars, or within four hundred days from mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds which have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more, nor has a suspensive appeal or other proceeding challenging the bond forfeiture been timely filed, the prosecuting attorney may file with the district court, in the parish where the bond is forfeited, a rule to show cause why that commercial surety company should not be prohibited from executing criminal bail bonds before the court issuing the judgment of bond forfeiture.

B.  At the rule to show cause, the court may consider only issues which would interrupt the enforceability of the judgment.  The court may issue an order enjoining the commercial surety company from posting criminal bail bonds before the court issuing the judgment of bond forfeiture if the judgment is not satisfied within ten days and if the court finds all of the following:

(1)  A judgment of bond forfeiture has been rendered, after June 22, 1993, against the commercial surety.

(2)  Proper notice pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 349.3 has been mailed.

(3)  No suspensive appeal has been taken.

(4)  The defendant has neither been surrendered nor appeared within one hundred eighty days of the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more, and the defendant has not been surrendered together with ten percent of the total amount of the bond more than one hundred eighty days but within two hundred seventy days after the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.

(5)  Two hundred ten days have passed since the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value under fifty thousand dollars, or four hundred days have passed since the date of mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture for bonds that have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more.

(6)  The judgment of bond forfeiture has not been satisfied by payment of the full amount for bonds that have a face value under fifty thousand dollars, or has not been satisfied by the surrender or the appearance of the defendant together with payment in cash of ten percent of the total bond amount for bonds that have a face value of fifty thousand dollars or more, if applicable.

C.  The burden of proof at the hearing shall be upon the commercial surety by a preponderance of evidence and shall be limited to documents contained in the official court record where the judgment was rendered.  The surety company may use evidence not contained in the record to show that it did not receive post-forfeiture notice or the post-forfeiture notice was not properly mailed.

Acts 1966, No. 311 §2, eff. Jan. 1, 1967.  Amended by Acts 1976, No. 579, §1; Acts 1979, No. 786, §1; Acts 1980, No. 639, §1; Acts 1982, No. 357, §1; Acts 1987, No. 728, §2; Acts 1987, No. 923, §1; Acts 1989, No. 191, §1; Acts 1990, No. 92, §1; Acts 1990, No. 520, §1; Acts 1993, No. 834, §4, eff. June 22, 1993; Acts 1994, 3rd Ex. Sess., No. 52, §3, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1997, No. 813, §1; Acts 1997, No. 815, §1; Acts 2001, No. 107, §1; Acts 2006, No. 466, §1, eff. June 15, 2006; Acts 2006, No. 699, §1; Acts 2006, No. 735, §1; Acts 2008, No. 415, §2, eff. Jan. 1, 2009; Acts 2010, No. 710, §2; Acts 2010, No. 914, §3.

NOTE:  Section 2 of Acts 2006, No. 699, provides that the provisions of the Act shall apply only to actions filed on or after Aug. 15, 2006.  Actions pending before Aug. 15, 2006, shall be governed by prior law.