A. Protect the privacy rights of individual employees in the State from undue invasion by employers through the use of substance abuse tests while allowing the use of tests when the employer has a compelling reason to administer a test; [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF).]
B. Ensure that, when substance abuse tests are used, proper test procedures are employed to protect the privacy rights of employees and applicants and to achieve reliable and accurate results; [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §1 (AMD).]
C. Ensure that an employee with a substance abuse problem receives an opportunity for rehabilitation and treatment of the disease and returns to work as quickly as possible; and [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §1 (AMD).]
D. Eliminate drug use in the workplace. [1989, c. 832, §1 (NEW).]
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §1 (AMD) .]
2. Employer discretion. This subchapter does not require or encourage employers to conduct substance abuse testing of employees or applicants. An employer who chooses to conduct such testing is limited by this subchapter, but may establish policies which are supplemental to and not inconsistent with this subchapter.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
3. Collective bargaining agreements. This subchapter does not prevent the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements that provide greater protection to employees or applicants than is provided by this subchapter.
A labor organization with a collective bargaining agreement effective in the State may conduct a program of substance abuse testing of its members. The program may include testing of new members and periodic testing of all members. It may not include random testing of members. The program may be voluntary. The results may not be used to preclude referral to a job where testing is not required or to otherwise discipline a member. Sample collection and testing must be done in accordance with this subchapter. Approval of the Department of Labor is not required.
[ 1995, c. 324, §1 (AMD) .]
4. Home rule authority preempted. No municipality may enact any ordinance under its home rule authority regulating an employer's use of substance abuse tests.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
5. Contracts for work out of State. All employment contracts subject to the laws of this State shall include an agreement that this subchapter will apply to any employer who hires employees to work outside the State.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
6. Medical examinations. This subchapter does not prevent an employer from requiring or performing medical examinations of employees or applicants or from conducting medical screenings to monitor exposure to toxic or other harmful substances in the workplace, provided that these examinations are not used to avoid the restrictions of this subchapter. No such examination may include the use of any substance abuse test except in compliance with this subchapter.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
7. Other discipline unaffected. This subchapter does not prevent an employer from establishing rules related to the possession or use of substances of abuse by employees, including convictions for drug-related offenses, and taking action based upon a violation of any of those rules, except when a substance abuse test is required, requested or suggested by the employer or used as the basis for any disciplinary action.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
8. Nuclear power plants; federal law. The following limitations apply to the application of this subchapter.
A. This subchapter does not apply to nuclear electrical generating facilities and their employees, including independent contractors and employees of independent contractors who are working at nuclear electrical generating facilities. [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §2 (RPR).]
B. This subchapter, except for section 685, subsection 2 and section 689, subsections 1 and 4, does not apply to employees subject to substance abuse testing under any federal law or regulation or under rules adopted by the Department of Public Safety that incorporate any federal laws or regulations related to substance abuse testing for motor carriers. This exception does not prevent the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements that provide greater protection to employees as long as the agreements are consistent with federal law.
(1) For the purposes of applying section 685, subsection 2 to an employee under this paragraph, the employee is deemed to have previously worked in an employment position subject to random or arbitrary testing under an employer's written policy. [1995, c. 324, §2 (AMD).]
[ 1995, c. 324, §2 (AMD) .]
9. Board of Licensure of Railroad Personnel; testing restricted.
[ 1993, c. 428, §3 (RP) .]
SECTION HISTORY
1989, c. 536, §§1,2 (NEW). 1989, c. 604, §§2,3 (AMD). 1989, c. 832, §§1-3 (AMD). 1993, c. 428, §3 (AMD). 1995, c. 324, §§1,2 (AMD).
A. Protect the privacy rights of individual employees in the State from undue invasion by employers through the use of substance abuse tests while allowing the use of tests when the employer has a compelling reason to administer a test; [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF).]
B. Ensure that, when substance abuse tests are used, proper test procedures are employed to protect the privacy rights of employees and applicants and to achieve reliable and accurate results; [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §1 (AMD).]
C. Ensure that an employee with a substance abuse problem receives an opportunity for rehabilitation and treatment of the disease and returns to work as quickly as possible; and [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §1 (AMD).]
D. Eliminate drug use in the workplace. [1989, c. 832, §1 (NEW).]
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §1 (AMD) .]
2. Employer discretion. This subchapter does not require or encourage employers to conduct substance abuse testing of employees or applicants. An employer who chooses to conduct such testing is limited by this subchapter, but may establish policies which are supplemental to and not inconsistent with this subchapter.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
3. Collective bargaining agreements. This subchapter does not prevent the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements that provide greater protection to employees or applicants than is provided by this subchapter.
A labor organization with a collective bargaining agreement effective in the State may conduct a program of substance abuse testing of its members. The program may include testing of new members and periodic testing of all members. It may not include random testing of members. The program may be voluntary. The results may not be used to preclude referral to a job where testing is not required or to otherwise discipline a member. Sample collection and testing must be done in accordance with this subchapter. Approval of the Department of Labor is not required.
[ 1995, c. 324, §1 (AMD) .]
4. Home rule authority preempted. No municipality may enact any ordinance under its home rule authority regulating an employer's use of substance abuse tests.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
5. Contracts for work out of State. All employment contracts subject to the laws of this State shall include an agreement that this subchapter will apply to any employer who hires employees to work outside the State.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
6. Medical examinations. This subchapter does not prevent an employer from requiring or performing medical examinations of employees or applicants or from conducting medical screenings to monitor exposure to toxic or other harmful substances in the workplace, provided that these examinations are not used to avoid the restrictions of this subchapter. No such examination may include the use of any substance abuse test except in compliance with this subchapter.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
7. Other discipline unaffected. This subchapter does not prevent an employer from establishing rules related to the possession or use of substances of abuse by employees, including convictions for drug-related offenses, and taking action based upon a violation of any of those rules, except when a substance abuse test is required, requested or suggested by the employer or used as the basis for any disciplinary action.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
8. Nuclear power plants; federal law. The following limitations apply to the application of this subchapter.
A. This subchapter does not apply to nuclear electrical generating facilities and their employees, including independent contractors and employees of independent contractors who are working at nuclear electrical generating facilities. [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §2 (RPR).]
B. This subchapter, except for section 685, subsection 2 and section 689, subsections 1 and 4, does not apply to employees subject to substance abuse testing under any federal law or regulation or under rules adopted by the Department of Public Safety that incorporate any federal laws or regulations related to substance abuse testing for motor carriers. This exception does not prevent the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements that provide greater protection to employees as long as the agreements are consistent with federal law.
(1) For the purposes of applying section 685, subsection 2 to an employee under this paragraph, the employee is deemed to have previously worked in an employment position subject to random or arbitrary testing under an employer's written policy. [1995, c. 324, §2 (AMD).]
[ 1995, c. 324, §2 (AMD) .]
9. Board of Licensure of Railroad Personnel; testing restricted.
[ 1993, c. 428, §3 (RP) .]
SECTION HISTORY
1989, c. 536, §§1,2 (NEW). 1989, c. 604, §§2,3 (AMD). 1989, c. 832, §§1-3 (AMD). 1993, c. 428, §3 (AMD). 1995, c. 324, §§1,2 (AMD).
A. Protect the privacy rights of individual employees in the State from undue invasion by employers through the use of substance abuse tests while allowing the use of tests when the employer has a compelling reason to administer a test; [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF).]
B. Ensure that, when substance abuse tests are used, proper test procedures are employed to protect the privacy rights of employees and applicants and to achieve reliable and accurate results; [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §1 (AMD).]
C. Ensure that an employee with a substance abuse problem receives an opportunity for rehabilitation and treatment of the disease and returns to work as quickly as possible; and [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §1 (AMD).]
D. Eliminate drug use in the workplace. [1989, c. 832, §1 (NEW).]
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §1 (AMD) .]
2. Employer discretion. This subchapter does not require or encourage employers to conduct substance abuse testing of employees or applicants. An employer who chooses to conduct such testing is limited by this subchapter, but may establish policies which are supplemental to and not inconsistent with this subchapter.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
3. Collective bargaining agreements. This subchapter does not prevent the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements that provide greater protection to employees or applicants than is provided by this subchapter.
A labor organization with a collective bargaining agreement effective in the State may conduct a program of substance abuse testing of its members. The program may include testing of new members and periodic testing of all members. It may not include random testing of members. The program may be voluntary. The results may not be used to preclude referral to a job where testing is not required or to otherwise discipline a member. Sample collection and testing must be done in accordance with this subchapter. Approval of the Department of Labor is not required.
[ 1995, c. 324, §1 (AMD) .]
4. Home rule authority preempted. No municipality may enact any ordinance under its home rule authority regulating an employer's use of substance abuse tests.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
5. Contracts for work out of State. All employment contracts subject to the laws of this State shall include an agreement that this subchapter will apply to any employer who hires employees to work outside the State.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
6. Medical examinations. This subchapter does not prevent an employer from requiring or performing medical examinations of employees or applicants or from conducting medical screenings to monitor exposure to toxic or other harmful substances in the workplace, provided that these examinations are not used to avoid the restrictions of this subchapter. No such examination may include the use of any substance abuse test except in compliance with this subchapter.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
7. Other discipline unaffected. This subchapter does not prevent an employer from establishing rules related to the possession or use of substances of abuse by employees, including convictions for drug-related offenses, and taking action based upon a violation of any of those rules, except when a substance abuse test is required, requested or suggested by the employer or used as the basis for any disciplinary action.
[ 1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF) .]
8. Nuclear power plants; federal law. The following limitations apply to the application of this subchapter.
A. This subchapter does not apply to nuclear electrical generating facilities and their employees, including independent contractors and employees of independent contractors who are working at nuclear electrical generating facilities. [1989, c. 536, §§1, 2 (NEW); 1989, c. 604, §§2, 3 (AFF); 1989, c. 832, §2 (RPR).]
B. This subchapter, except for section 685, subsection 2 and section 689, subsections 1 and 4, does not apply to employees subject to substance abuse testing under any federal law or regulation or under rules adopted by the Department of Public Safety that incorporate any federal laws or regulations related to substance abuse testing for motor carriers. This exception does not prevent the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements that provide greater protection to employees as long as the agreements are consistent with federal law.
(1) For the purposes of applying section 685, subsection 2 to an employee under this paragraph, the employee is deemed to have previously worked in an employment position subject to random or arbitrary testing under an employer's written policy. [1995, c. 324, §2 (AMD).]
[ 1995, c. 324, §2 (AMD) .]
9. Board of Licensure of Railroad Personnel; testing restricted.
[ 1993, c. 428, §3 (RP) .]
SECTION HISTORY
1989, c. 536, §§1,2 (NEW). 1989, c. 604, §§2,3 (AMD). 1989, c. 832, §§1-3 (AMD). 1993, c. 428, §3 (AMD). 1995, c. 324, §§1,2 (AMD).
