State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Maryland > Commercial-law > Title-2a > Subtitle-2 > 202

§ 2A-202. Final written expression: Parol or extrinsic evidence.
 

Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented: 

(a) By course of dealing or usage of trade or by course of performance; and 

(b) By evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement. 
 

[1994, ch. 535.] 
 

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Maryland > Commercial-law > Title-2a > Subtitle-2 > 202

§ 2A-202. Final written expression: Parol or extrinsic evidence.
 

Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented: 

(a) By course of dealing or usage of trade or by course of performance; and 

(b) By evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement. 
 

[1994, ch. 535.] 
 


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Maryland > Commercial-law > Title-2a > Subtitle-2 > 202

§ 2A-202. Final written expression: Parol or extrinsic evidence.
 

Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented: 

(a) By course of dealing or usage of trade or by course of performance; and 

(b) By evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement. 
 

[1994, ch. 535.]