State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Michigan > Chapter-259 > Act-23-of-1950-ex-sess > Section-259-463

AIRPORT ZONING ACT (EXCERPT)
Act 23 of 1950 (Ex. Sess.)

259.463 Violation of act or regulations; penalty.

Sec. 33.

Any person who shall violate this act or any regulations, orders, or rulings promulgated or made pursuant to this act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $100.00 and imprisonment for a term not to exceed 90 days, and each day a violation continues to exist after notice shall constitute a separate offense. In addition, the political subdivision or joint airport zoning board adopting airport zoning regulations under this act may institute in the circuit court of any county in which the airport hazard area is located, in whole or in part, in connection with which such airport zoning regulations were adopted, an action to prevent, restrain, correct or abate any violation of this act, or of airport zoning regulations adopted under this act, or of any order or ruling made in connection with their administration or enforcement, and the court shall adjudge to the plaintiff such relief, by way of injunction (which may be mandatory) or otherwise, as may be proper under all the facts and circumstances of the case, in order to fully effectuate the purposes of this act and of the regulations adopted and orders and rulings made pursuant thereto.


History: 1950, Ex. Sess., Act 23, Imd. Eff. June 7, 1950

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Michigan > Chapter-259 > Act-23-of-1950-ex-sess > Section-259-463

AIRPORT ZONING ACT (EXCERPT)
Act 23 of 1950 (Ex. Sess.)

259.463 Violation of act or regulations; penalty.

Sec. 33.

Any person who shall violate this act or any regulations, orders, or rulings promulgated or made pursuant to this act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $100.00 and imprisonment for a term not to exceed 90 days, and each day a violation continues to exist after notice shall constitute a separate offense. In addition, the political subdivision or joint airport zoning board adopting airport zoning regulations under this act may institute in the circuit court of any county in which the airport hazard area is located, in whole or in part, in connection with which such airport zoning regulations were adopted, an action to prevent, restrain, correct or abate any violation of this act, or of airport zoning regulations adopted under this act, or of any order or ruling made in connection with their administration or enforcement, and the court shall adjudge to the plaintiff such relief, by way of injunction (which may be mandatory) or otherwise, as may be proper under all the facts and circumstances of the case, in order to fully effectuate the purposes of this act and of the regulations adopted and orders and rulings made pursuant thereto.


History: 1950, Ex. Sess., Act 23, Imd. Eff. June 7, 1950


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Michigan > Chapter-259 > Act-23-of-1950-ex-sess > Section-259-463

AIRPORT ZONING ACT (EXCERPT)
Act 23 of 1950 (Ex. Sess.)

259.463 Violation of act or regulations; penalty.

Sec. 33.

Any person who shall violate this act or any regulations, orders, or rulings promulgated or made pursuant to this act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $100.00 and imprisonment for a term not to exceed 90 days, and each day a violation continues to exist after notice shall constitute a separate offense. In addition, the political subdivision or joint airport zoning board adopting airport zoning regulations under this act may institute in the circuit court of any county in which the airport hazard area is located, in whole or in part, in connection with which such airport zoning regulations were adopted, an action to prevent, restrain, correct or abate any violation of this act, or of airport zoning regulations adopted under this act, or of any order or ruling made in connection with their administration or enforcement, and the court shall adjudge to the plaintiff such relief, by way of injunction (which may be mandatory) or otherwise, as may be proper under all the facts and circumstances of the case, in order to fully effectuate the purposes of this act and of the regulations adopted and orders and rulings made pursuant thereto.


History: 1950, Ex. Sess., Act 23, Imd. Eff. June 7, 1950