State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Minnesota > 14-15A > 14 > 14_69

14.69 SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW.

In a judicial review under sections 14.63 to 14.68, the court may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings; or it may reverse or modify the decision if the substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced because the administrative finding, inferences, conclusion, or decisions are:

(a) in violation of constitutional provisions; or

(b) in excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency; or

(c) made upon unlawful procedure; or

(d) affected by other error of law; or

(e) unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted; or

(f) arbitrary or capricious.

History:

1963 c 809 s 2; 1980 c 615 s 22; 1982 c 424 s 130

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Minnesota > 14-15A > 14 > 14_69

14.69 SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW.

In a judicial review under sections 14.63 to 14.68, the court may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings; or it may reverse or modify the decision if the substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced because the administrative finding, inferences, conclusion, or decisions are:

(a) in violation of constitutional provisions; or

(b) in excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency; or

(c) made upon unlawful procedure; or

(d) affected by other error of law; or

(e) unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted; or

(f) arbitrary or capricious.

History:

1963 c 809 s 2; 1980 c 615 s 22; 1982 c 424 s 130


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Minnesota > 14-15A > 14 > 14_69

14.69 SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW.

In a judicial review under sections 14.63 to 14.68, the court may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings; or it may reverse or modify the decision if the substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced because the administrative finding, inferences, conclusion, or decisions are:

(a) in violation of constitutional provisions; or

(b) in excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency; or

(c) made upon unlawful procedure; or

(d) affected by other error of law; or

(e) unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted; or

(f) arbitrary or capricious.

History:

1963 c 809 s 2; 1980 c 615 s 22; 1982 c 424 s 130