State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Missouri > T30 > C452 > 452_140

No property exempt from attachment or execution, when.

452.140. No property shall be exempt from attachment or execution ina proceeding instituted by a person for maintenance, nor from attachment orexecution upon a judgment or order issued to enforce a decree for alimonyor for the support and maintenance of children. And all wages due to thedefendant shall be subject to garnishment on attachment or execution in anyproceedings mentioned in this section, whether the wages are due from thegarnishee to the defendant for the last thirty days' service or not.

(RSMo 1939 § 3377, A.L. 1957 p. 391, A.L. 2001 H.B. 537)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 2990; 1919 § 7315; 1909 § 8296

(1952) Garnishment on judgment in divorce action for support and maintenance of minor children held limited to ten percent of wages of defendant who had remarried, had children and was head of family. York v. York (A.), 249 S.W.2d 870.

(1957) Where judgment consisting of $1,243.33 for alimony and $2,486.67 for child support was revived in 1953 against nonresident defendant, garnishment could reach only 10% of amount of defendant's wages for child support but entire amount of wages could be seized to satisfy judgment for alimony. Ferneau v. Armour & Co. (A.), 303 S.W.2d 161.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Missouri > T30 > C452 > 452_140

No property exempt from attachment or execution, when.

452.140. No property shall be exempt from attachment or execution ina proceeding instituted by a person for maintenance, nor from attachment orexecution upon a judgment or order issued to enforce a decree for alimonyor for the support and maintenance of children. And all wages due to thedefendant shall be subject to garnishment on attachment or execution in anyproceedings mentioned in this section, whether the wages are due from thegarnishee to the defendant for the last thirty days' service or not.

(RSMo 1939 § 3377, A.L. 1957 p. 391, A.L. 2001 H.B. 537)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 2990; 1919 § 7315; 1909 § 8296

(1952) Garnishment on judgment in divorce action for support and maintenance of minor children held limited to ten percent of wages of defendant who had remarried, had children and was head of family. York v. York (A.), 249 S.W.2d 870.

(1957) Where judgment consisting of $1,243.33 for alimony and $2,486.67 for child support was revived in 1953 against nonresident defendant, garnishment could reach only 10% of amount of defendant's wages for child support but entire amount of wages could be seized to satisfy judgment for alimony. Ferneau v. Armour & Co. (A.), 303 S.W.2d 161.


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Missouri > T30 > C452 > 452_140

No property exempt from attachment or execution, when.

452.140. No property shall be exempt from attachment or execution ina proceeding instituted by a person for maintenance, nor from attachment orexecution upon a judgment or order issued to enforce a decree for alimonyor for the support and maintenance of children. And all wages due to thedefendant shall be subject to garnishment on attachment or execution in anyproceedings mentioned in this section, whether the wages are due from thegarnishee to the defendant for the last thirty days' service or not.

(RSMo 1939 § 3377, A.L. 1957 p. 391, A.L. 2001 H.B. 537)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 2990; 1919 § 7315; 1909 § 8296

(1952) Garnishment on judgment in divorce action for support and maintenance of minor children held limited to ten percent of wages of defendant who had remarried, had children and was head of family. York v. York (A.), 249 S.W.2d 870.

(1957) Where judgment consisting of $1,243.33 for alimony and $2,486.67 for child support was revived in 1953 against nonresident defendant, garnishment could reach only 10% of amount of defendant's wages for child support but entire amount of wages could be seized to satisfy judgment for alimony. Ferneau v. Armour & Co. (A.), 303 S.W.2d 161.