544.640. If, without sufficient cause or excuse, thedefendant fails to appear for trial or judgment, or upon anyother occasion when his presence in court may be lawfullyrequired, according to the condition of his recognizance, thecourt must direct the fact to be entered upon its minutes, andthereupon the recognizance is forfeited, and the same shall beproceeded upon by scire facias to final judgment and executionthereon, although the defendant may be afterward arrested on theoriginal charge, unless remitted by the court for cause shown.
(1954) Words "unless remitted by the court for cause shown" relate to the whole of § 544.640 and trial court, while the matter is pending before it, may for cause remit the penalty before final judgment but such remission must be based on proof of extraordinary and unusual circumstances. State v. Salisbury, 364 Mo. 1039, 271 S.W.2d 522.
(1961) Where defendant failed to appear on misdemeanor charge at time fixed in his bond, the bond could be forfeited, notwithstanding his attorney appeared and the information in the case was dismissed as being insufficient. State v. Norton (Mo.), 347 S.W.2d 849.
(1973) Incarceration of defendant in another state is not circumstance which will discharge his surety as a matter of law. State v. Jones (Mo.), 491 S.W.2d 241.
(1974) Only grounds for discharge of a surety on a bail bond are failure to appear because of (1) an act of God, (2) an act of law, (3) an act of an obligee. State owes no duty to have party returned under agreement on detainers in order to avoid forfeiture of bond. State v. Patterson (A.), 508 S.W.2d 304.
(1974) Held that release of surety on bond is mandatory where defendant is produced in open court after forfeiture of bond but before a judgment on the forfeiture. Proper venue for action on the bond is in court of county where action commenced, not in county to which action was transferred on change of venue. State v. Street (A.), 510 S.W.2d 225.
(1974) Held that court is not required to have either accused or his bondsman called prior to forfeiture of bail. State v. Henderson (A.), 512 S.W.2d 218.
(1980) After the police had obtained custody of defendant and a bail bond forfeiture proceeding is subsequently held, the court is not required to release surety from liability. State v. Armstrong (A.), 605 S.W.2d 526.
544.640. If, without sufficient cause or excuse, thedefendant fails to appear for trial or judgment, or upon anyother occasion when his presence in court may be lawfullyrequired, according to the condition of his recognizance, thecourt must direct the fact to be entered upon its minutes, andthereupon the recognizance is forfeited, and the same shall beproceeded upon by scire facias to final judgment and executionthereon, although the defendant may be afterward arrested on theoriginal charge, unless remitted by the court for cause shown.
(1954) Words "unless remitted by the court for cause shown" relate to the whole of § 544.640 and trial court, while the matter is pending before it, may for cause remit the penalty before final judgment but such remission must be based on proof of extraordinary and unusual circumstances. State v. Salisbury, 364 Mo. 1039, 271 S.W.2d 522.
(1961) Where defendant failed to appear on misdemeanor charge at time fixed in his bond, the bond could be forfeited, notwithstanding his attorney appeared and the information in the case was dismissed as being insufficient. State v. Norton (Mo.), 347 S.W.2d 849.
(1973) Incarceration of defendant in another state is not circumstance which will discharge his surety as a matter of law. State v. Jones (Mo.), 491 S.W.2d 241.
(1974) Only grounds for discharge of a surety on a bail bond are failure to appear because of (1) an act of God, (2) an act of law, (3) an act of an obligee. State owes no duty to have party returned under agreement on detainers in order to avoid forfeiture of bond. State v. Patterson (A.), 508 S.W.2d 304.
(1974) Held that release of surety on bond is mandatory where defendant is produced in open court after forfeiture of bond but before a judgment on the forfeiture. Proper venue for action on the bond is in court of county where action commenced, not in county to which action was transferred on change of venue. State v. Street (A.), 510 S.W.2d 225.
(1974) Held that court is not required to have either accused or his bondsman called prior to forfeiture of bail. State v. Henderson (A.), 512 S.W.2d 218.
(1980) After the police had obtained custody of defendant and a bail bond forfeiture proceeding is subsequently held, the court is not required to release surety from liability. State v. Armstrong (A.), 605 S.W.2d 526.
544.640. If, without sufficient cause or excuse, thedefendant fails to appear for trial or judgment, or upon anyother occasion when his presence in court may be lawfullyrequired, according to the condition of his recognizance, thecourt must direct the fact to be entered upon its minutes, andthereupon the recognizance is forfeited, and the same shall beproceeded upon by scire facias to final judgment and executionthereon, although the defendant may be afterward arrested on theoriginal charge, unless remitted by the court for cause shown.
(1954) Words "unless remitted by the court for cause shown" relate to the whole of § 544.640 and trial court, while the matter is pending before it, may for cause remit the penalty before final judgment but such remission must be based on proof of extraordinary and unusual circumstances. State v. Salisbury, 364 Mo. 1039, 271 S.W.2d 522.
(1961) Where defendant failed to appear on misdemeanor charge at time fixed in his bond, the bond could be forfeited, notwithstanding his attorney appeared and the information in the case was dismissed as being insufficient. State v. Norton (Mo.), 347 S.W.2d 849.
(1973) Incarceration of defendant in another state is not circumstance which will discharge his surety as a matter of law. State v. Jones (Mo.), 491 S.W.2d 241.
(1974) Only grounds for discharge of a surety on a bail bond are failure to appear because of (1) an act of God, (2) an act of law, (3) an act of an obligee. State owes no duty to have party returned under agreement on detainers in order to avoid forfeiture of bond. State v. Patterson (A.), 508 S.W.2d 304.
(1974) Held that release of surety on bond is mandatory where defendant is produced in open court after forfeiture of bond but before a judgment on the forfeiture. Proper venue for action on the bond is in court of county where action commenced, not in county to which action was transferred on change of venue. State v. Street (A.), 510 S.W.2d 225.
(1974) Held that court is not required to have either accused or his bondsman called prior to forfeiture of bail. State v. Henderson (A.), 512 S.W.2d 218.
(1980) After the police had obtained custody of defendant and a bail bond forfeiture proceeding is subsequently held, the court is not required to release surety from liability. State v. Armstrong (A.), 605 S.W.2d 526.
