State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Missouri > T37 > C545 > 545_300

Informations--amendment--substitution for defective indictment.

545.300. An information may be amended either as to form orsubstance at any time before the jury is sworn, but no suchamendment shall be allowed as would operate to charge an offensedifferent from that charged or attempted to be charged in theoriginal information. If an indictment be held to beinsufficient either as to form or substance, an informationcharging the same offense charged or attempted to be charged insuch indictment may be substituted therefor at any time beforethe jury is sworn. No amendment of the information orsubstitution of an information for an indictment as hereinprovided shall cause a delay of the trial unless the defendantshall satisfy the court that such amendment or substitution hasmade it necessary that he have additional time in which toprepare his defense.

(RSMo 1939 § 3953)

Prior revision: 1929 § 3564

(1953) The right of the state to substitute an information for a defective indictment is intended to be exercised in the discretion of the prosecuting attorney and court has no power to control such discretion. State ex rel. Downs v. Kimberlin, 364 Mo. 215, 260 S.W.2d 552.

(1956) Where conviction was had on information based on city ordinance which was repealed at time of alleged offense, appellate court could not remand case for trial on ordinance which was in effect at such time, where the later ordinance was not in evidence. City of St. Louis v. Vetter (A.), 293 S.W.2d 140.

(1957) Order holding indictment insufficient held not necessary in order to permit substitution of information therefor. State v. Green (Mo.), 305 S.W.2d 863.

(1958) It was not abuse of discretion for trial judge to permit amendment of information charging robbery in first degree so as to charge defendant also as a habitual criminal when the record did not evidence any bad faith on part of prosecuting attorney and the state had additional evidence to show three prior felony convictions and subsequent discharge therefor though the jury failed to convict defendant thereunder. State v. Whitaker (Mo.), 312 S.W.2d 34.

(1966) Indictment cannot be amended by the court or the prosecuting attorney, but only by the grand jury which has returned it. State v. Holbert (A.), 399 S.W.2d 142.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Missouri > T37 > C545 > 545_300

Informations--amendment--substitution for defective indictment.

545.300. An information may be amended either as to form orsubstance at any time before the jury is sworn, but no suchamendment shall be allowed as would operate to charge an offensedifferent from that charged or attempted to be charged in theoriginal information. If an indictment be held to beinsufficient either as to form or substance, an informationcharging the same offense charged or attempted to be charged insuch indictment may be substituted therefor at any time beforethe jury is sworn. No amendment of the information orsubstitution of an information for an indictment as hereinprovided shall cause a delay of the trial unless the defendantshall satisfy the court that such amendment or substitution hasmade it necessary that he have additional time in which toprepare his defense.

(RSMo 1939 § 3953)

Prior revision: 1929 § 3564

(1953) The right of the state to substitute an information for a defective indictment is intended to be exercised in the discretion of the prosecuting attorney and court has no power to control such discretion. State ex rel. Downs v. Kimberlin, 364 Mo. 215, 260 S.W.2d 552.

(1956) Where conviction was had on information based on city ordinance which was repealed at time of alleged offense, appellate court could not remand case for trial on ordinance which was in effect at such time, where the later ordinance was not in evidence. City of St. Louis v. Vetter (A.), 293 S.W.2d 140.

(1957) Order holding indictment insufficient held not necessary in order to permit substitution of information therefor. State v. Green (Mo.), 305 S.W.2d 863.

(1958) It was not abuse of discretion for trial judge to permit amendment of information charging robbery in first degree so as to charge defendant also as a habitual criminal when the record did not evidence any bad faith on part of prosecuting attorney and the state had additional evidence to show three prior felony convictions and subsequent discharge therefor though the jury failed to convict defendant thereunder. State v. Whitaker (Mo.), 312 S.W.2d 34.

(1966) Indictment cannot be amended by the court or the prosecuting attorney, but only by the grand jury which has returned it. State v. Holbert (A.), 399 S.W.2d 142.


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Missouri > T37 > C545 > 545_300

Informations--amendment--substitution for defective indictment.

545.300. An information may be amended either as to form orsubstance at any time before the jury is sworn, but no suchamendment shall be allowed as would operate to charge an offensedifferent from that charged or attempted to be charged in theoriginal information. If an indictment be held to beinsufficient either as to form or substance, an informationcharging the same offense charged or attempted to be charged insuch indictment may be substituted therefor at any time beforethe jury is sworn. No amendment of the information orsubstitution of an information for an indictment as hereinprovided shall cause a delay of the trial unless the defendantshall satisfy the court that such amendment or substitution hasmade it necessary that he have additional time in which toprepare his defense.

(RSMo 1939 § 3953)

Prior revision: 1929 § 3564

(1953) The right of the state to substitute an information for a defective indictment is intended to be exercised in the discretion of the prosecuting attorney and court has no power to control such discretion. State ex rel. Downs v. Kimberlin, 364 Mo. 215, 260 S.W.2d 552.

(1956) Where conviction was had on information based on city ordinance which was repealed at time of alleged offense, appellate court could not remand case for trial on ordinance which was in effect at such time, where the later ordinance was not in evidence. City of St. Louis v. Vetter (A.), 293 S.W.2d 140.

(1957) Order holding indictment insufficient held not necessary in order to permit substitution of information therefor. State v. Green (Mo.), 305 S.W.2d 863.

(1958) It was not abuse of discretion for trial judge to permit amendment of information charging robbery in first degree so as to charge defendant also as a habitual criminal when the record did not evidence any bad faith on part of prosecuting attorney and the state had additional evidence to show three prior felony convictions and subsequent discharge therefor though the jury failed to convict defendant thereunder. State v. Whitaker (Mo.), 312 S.W.2d 34.

(1966) Indictment cannot be amended by the court or the prosecuting attorney, but only by the grand jury which has returned it. State v. Holbert (A.), 399 S.W.2d 142.