State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Missouri > T37 > C545 > 545_400

Conditional examination of witnesses.

545.400. The defendant in any criminal cause may also havewitnesses examined on his behalf, conditionally, upon acommission issued by the clerk of the court in which the cause ispending, in the same cases and upon the like notice to theprosecuting attorney, with the like effect and in all respects asis provided by law in civil suits; provided, that the notice insuch case to the prosecuting attorney shall state the name ornames of the witness or witnesses whose depositions are desiredor will be taken.

(RSMo 1939 § 4012)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 3623; 1919 § 3966; 1909 § 5173

(1959) Supreme court rule 25.10 does not authorize taking of depositions after filing of felony complaint but before preliminary hearing since case is not pending until information is filed or indictment is returned. State ex rel. Woods v. Ratliff (Mo.), 322 S.W.2d 864.

(1964) There is no statutory authority for court order requiring payment by the state of the costs of the taking of depositions on behalf of defendant in criminal proceedings. Failure to furnish free depositions is not a violation of defendant's constitutional rights. State v. Aubuchon (Mo.), 381 S.W.2d 807.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Missouri > T37 > C545 > 545_400

Conditional examination of witnesses.

545.400. The defendant in any criminal cause may also havewitnesses examined on his behalf, conditionally, upon acommission issued by the clerk of the court in which the cause ispending, in the same cases and upon the like notice to theprosecuting attorney, with the like effect and in all respects asis provided by law in civil suits; provided, that the notice insuch case to the prosecuting attorney shall state the name ornames of the witness or witnesses whose depositions are desiredor will be taken.

(RSMo 1939 § 4012)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 3623; 1919 § 3966; 1909 § 5173

(1959) Supreme court rule 25.10 does not authorize taking of depositions after filing of felony complaint but before preliminary hearing since case is not pending until information is filed or indictment is returned. State ex rel. Woods v. Ratliff (Mo.), 322 S.W.2d 864.

(1964) There is no statutory authority for court order requiring payment by the state of the costs of the taking of depositions on behalf of defendant in criminal proceedings. Failure to furnish free depositions is not a violation of defendant's constitutional rights. State v. Aubuchon (Mo.), 381 S.W.2d 807.


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Missouri > T37 > C545 > 545_400

Conditional examination of witnesses.

545.400. The defendant in any criminal cause may also havewitnesses examined on his behalf, conditionally, upon acommission issued by the clerk of the court in which the cause ispending, in the same cases and upon the like notice to theprosecuting attorney, with the like effect and in all respects asis provided by law in civil suits; provided, that the notice insuch case to the prosecuting attorney shall state the name ornames of the witness or witnesses whose depositions are desiredor will be taken.

(RSMo 1939 § 4012)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 3623; 1919 § 3966; 1909 § 5173

(1959) Supreme court rule 25.10 does not authorize taking of depositions after filing of felony complaint but before preliminary hearing since case is not pending until information is filed or indictment is returned. State ex rel. Woods v. Ratliff (Mo.), 322 S.W.2d 864.

(1964) There is no statutory authority for court order requiring payment by the state of the costs of the taking of depositions on behalf of defendant in criminal proceedings. Failure to furnish free depositions is not a violation of defendant's constitutional rights. State v. Aubuchon (Mo.), 381 S.W.2d 807.