578.173. Baiting or fighting animals -- penalty. -- 1. Any personwho commits any of the following acts is guilty of a class D felony:
(1) Baiting or fighting animals;
(2) Permitting baiting or animal fighting to be done on any premisesunder his charge or control;
(3) Promoting, conducting, or staging a baiting or fight between twoor more animals;
(4) Advertising a baiting or fight between two or more animals;
(5) Collecting any admission fee for a baiting or fight between twoor more animals.
2. Any person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of aclass A misdemeanor:
(1) Knowingly attending the baiting or fighting of animals;
(2) Knowingly selling, offering for sale, shipping, or transportingany animal which has been bred or trained to bait or fight another animal;
(3) Owning or possessing any of the cockfighting implements, commonlyknown as gaffs and slashers, or any other sharp implement designed to beattached to the leg of a gamecock;
(4) Manufacturing, selling, bartering or exchanging any of thecockfighting implements, commonly known as gaffs and slashers, or any othersharp implement designed to be attached to the leg of a gamecock.
(Adopted by Initiative, Proposition A, § B, November 3, 1998)
Effective 12-3-98
(2000) Proposition A did not violate constitutional requirements of single subject and clear title. United Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n. of Missouri v. Nixon, 19 S.W.3d 137 (Mo.banc).
578.173. Baiting or fighting animals -- penalty. -- 1. Any personwho commits any of the following acts is guilty of a class D felony:
(1) Baiting or fighting animals;
(2) Permitting baiting or animal fighting to be done on any premisesunder his charge or control;
(3) Promoting, conducting, or staging a baiting or fight between twoor more animals;
(4) Advertising a baiting or fight between two or more animals;
(5) Collecting any admission fee for a baiting or fight between twoor more animals.
2. Any person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of aclass A misdemeanor:
(1) Knowingly attending the baiting or fighting of animals;
(2) Knowingly selling, offering for sale, shipping, or transportingany animal which has been bred or trained to bait or fight another animal;
(3) Owning or possessing any of the cockfighting implements, commonlyknown as gaffs and slashers, or any other sharp implement designed to beattached to the leg of a gamecock;
(4) Manufacturing, selling, bartering or exchanging any of thecockfighting implements, commonly known as gaffs and slashers, or any othersharp implement designed to be attached to the leg of a gamecock.
(Adopted by Initiative, Proposition A, § B, November 3, 1998)
Effective 12-3-98
(2000) Proposition A did not violate constitutional requirements of single subject and clear title. United Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n. of Missouri v. Nixon, 19 S.W.3d 137 (Mo.banc).
578.173. Baiting or fighting animals -- penalty. -- 1. Any personwho commits any of the following acts is guilty of a class D felony:
(1) Baiting or fighting animals;
(2) Permitting baiting or animal fighting to be done on any premisesunder his charge or control;
(3) Promoting, conducting, or staging a baiting or fight between twoor more animals;
(4) Advertising a baiting or fight between two or more animals;
(5) Collecting any admission fee for a baiting or fight between twoor more animals.
2. Any person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of aclass A misdemeanor:
(1) Knowingly attending the baiting or fighting of animals;
(2) Knowingly selling, offering for sale, shipping, or transportingany animal which has been bred or trained to bait or fight another animal;
(3) Owning or possessing any of the cockfighting implements, commonlyknown as gaffs and slashers, or any other sharp implement designed to beattached to the leg of a gamecock;
(4) Manufacturing, selling, bartering or exchanging any of thecockfighting implements, commonly known as gaffs and slashers, or any othersharp implement designed to be attached to the leg of a gamecock.
(Adopted by Initiative, Proposition A, § B, November 3, 1998)
Effective 12-3-98
(2000) Proposition A did not violate constitutional requirements of single subject and clear title. United Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n. of Missouri v. Nixon, 19 S.W.3d 137 (Mo.banc).
