I. Any person aggrieved by a decision made by the department under RSA 482-A:3 may apply for reconsideration by the department, and then may appeal to the wetlands council and to the supreme court as provided in this section. A person aggrieved under this section shall mean the applicant and any person required to be noticed by mail in accordance with RSA 482-A:8 and RSA 482-A:9. I-a. Any person subject to an order of the department under RSA 482-A:6 may appeal to the wetlands council and to the supreme court as provided in this section. The appellant shall not first request reconsideration, but shall file the appeal directly with the council as provided in paragraph IV, within 30 days of the date of the order. II. A request for reconsideration of a department decision under RSA 482-A:3 shall be filed with the department within 30 days of issuance of the department's decision. The request for reconsideration shall describe in detail each ground for the request for reconsideration. III. On reconsideration, the department shall receive and consider any new and additional evidence presented, and shall make findings of fact and rulings of law in support of its decision after reconsideration. The department may hold a public hearing in accordance with its rules. Reconsideration hearings shall not be subject to the requirements of RSA 541-A. Reconsideration hearings shall be noticed in accordance with rules adopted by the department, which notice shall be sent to all persons entitled to notice of applications under RSA 482-A:8 and RSA 482-A:9, and the department shall make a record of the proceedings. The department shall grant or deny the request for reconsideration within 30 days of the department's receipt of the request or explain in writing to the applicant why the request cannot be acted on and a statement of the time reasonably necessary to act on the request. However, if the basis for denial includes failure by the applicant to submit all requested information and the applicant submits all of the requested information with the request for reconsideration, the department shall act on the request within 75 days from the date of the department's receipt of the request for projects where the applicant proposes under one acre of jurisdictional impact, and within 105 days for all other projects. IV. An appeal from a decision of the department under RSA 482-A:3 after reconsideration, or an appeal from an order issued by the department under RSA 482-A:6, shall be filed with the wetlands council within 30 days of the department's decision or order. An appeal shall be considered timely filed and received by the wetlands council if postmarked or hand delivered to the wetlands council on or before the thirtieth day from the date of the department's decision. Filing of the appeal shall be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the wetlands council, with a copy sent to the department. An appeal to the council shall contain a detailed description of the land involved in the department's decision and shall set forth fully every ground upon which it is claimed that the decision complained of is unlawful or unreasonable. Only those grounds set forth in the appeal shall be considered by the council. V. The council on appeal shall hold an adjudicative hearing as provided in RSA 541-A and the council's rules. The hearing shall be noticed in accordance with RSA 541-A:31, III. For appeals of department decisions under RSA 482-A:3, the notice shall also be sent to all persons entitled to notice of applications under RSA 482-A:8 and RSA 482-A:9. The burden of proof shall be on the party seeking to set aside the department's decision to show that the decision is unlawful or unreasonable. On appeal of requests proposed, sponsored, or administered by the department of transportation, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that there is a public need for the requested project, and that the department of transportation has exercised appropriate engineering judgment in the project's design. All findings of the department upon all questions of fact properly before it shall be prima facie lawful and reasonable. V-a. Any person whose rights will be directly affected by the outcome of the appeal may appear and become a party to the appeal. Any person whose rights may be directly affected by the outcome of the appeal may file a request to intervene as provided in RSA 541-A:32. VI. On appeal, the council may affirm the decision of the department or may remand to the department with a determination that the decision complained of is unlawful or unreasonable. The council shall specify the factual and legal basis for its determination and shall identify the evidence in the record created before the council that supports its decision. VII. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the council may apply to the council for reconsideration as specified in RSA 541. VIII. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the council after reconsideration may appeal to the supreme court as specified in RSA 541. IX. In the case of a remand to the department by the council, the department may accept the council's determination and reissue a decision or order, imposing such conditions as are necessary and consistent with the purposes of this chapter, or may appeal as provided in paragraphs VII and VIII. X. [Repealed.] XI. [Repealed.] XII. [Repealed.] XIII. [Repealed.] XIV. [Repealed.] XV. [Repealed.] XVI. [Repealed.] XVII. [Repealed.] XVIII. If a permit is granted with respect to any activity proposed to be undertaken in or adjacent to a prime wetland as mapped, designated, and filed pursuant to RSA 482-A:15, the conservation commission or local governing body may request reconsideration by the department and, if aggrieved by the decision or reconsideration, appeal said decision to the wetlands council and the supreme court in the manner prescribed in this section. The filing of a request for reconsideration shall automatically stay the effectiveness of the department's decision relating to said prime wetland. Said stay shall remain in force until the department has issued its decision after reconsideration.
Source. 1989, 339:1. 1991, 20:5. 1996, 296:45, eff. Aug. 9, 1996. 2004, 2:2, 3, eff. Mar. 5, 2004; 243:3, eff. July 1, 2004. 2008, 171:6, 7, 16, eff. July 1, 2008; 363:5, eff. Sept. 9, 2008.
I. Any person aggrieved by a decision made by the department under RSA 482-A:3 may apply for reconsideration by the department, and then may appeal to the wetlands council and to the supreme court as provided in this section. A person aggrieved under this section shall mean the applicant and any person required to be noticed by mail in accordance with RSA 482-A:8 and RSA 482-A:9. I-a. Any person subject to an order of the department under RSA 482-A:6 may appeal to the wetlands council and to the supreme court as provided in this section. The appellant shall not first request reconsideration, but shall file the appeal directly with the council as provided in paragraph IV, within 30 days of the date of the order. II. A request for reconsideration of a department decision under RSA 482-A:3 shall be filed with the department within 30 days of issuance of the department's decision. The request for reconsideration shall describe in detail each ground for the request for reconsideration. III. On reconsideration, the department shall receive and consider any new and additional evidence presented, and shall make findings of fact and rulings of law in support of its decision after reconsideration. The department may hold a public hearing in accordance with its rules. Reconsideration hearings shall not be subject to the requirements of RSA 541-A. Reconsideration hearings shall be noticed in accordance with rules adopted by the department, which notice shall be sent to all persons entitled to notice of applications under RSA 482-A:8 and RSA 482-A:9, and the department shall make a record of the proceedings. The department shall grant or deny the request for reconsideration within 30 days of the department's receipt of the request or explain in writing to the applicant why the request cannot be acted on and a statement of the time reasonably necessary to act on the request. However, if the basis for denial includes failure by the applicant to submit all requested information and the applicant submits all of the requested information with the request for reconsideration, the department shall act on the request within 75 days from the date of the department's receipt of the request for projects where the applicant proposes under one acre of jurisdictional impact, and within 105 days for all other projects. IV. An appeal from a decision of the department under RSA 482-A:3 after reconsideration, or an appeal from an order issued by the department under RSA 482-A:6, shall be filed with the wetlands council within 30 days of the department's decision or order. An appeal shall be considered timely filed and received by the wetlands council if postmarked or hand delivered to the wetlands council on or before the thirtieth day from the date of the department's decision. Filing of the appeal shall be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the wetlands council, with a copy sent to the department. An appeal to the council shall contain a detailed description of the land involved in the department's decision and shall set forth fully every ground upon which it is claimed that the decision complained of is unlawful or unreasonable. Only those grounds set forth in the appeal shall be considered by the council. V. The council on appeal shall hold an adjudicative hearing as provided in RSA 541-A and the council's rules. The hearing shall be noticed in accordance with RSA 541-A:31, III. For appeals of department decisions under RSA 482-A:3, the notice shall also be sent to all persons entitled to notice of applications under RSA 482-A:8 and RSA 482-A:9. The burden of proof shall be on the party seeking to set aside the department's decision to show that the decision is unlawful or unreasonable. On appeal of requests proposed, sponsored, or administered by the department of transportation, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that there is a public need for the requested project, and that the department of transportation has exercised appropriate engineering judgment in the project's design. All findings of the department upon all questions of fact properly before it shall be prima facie lawful and reasonable. V-a. Any person whose rights will be directly affected by the outcome of the appeal may appear and become a party to the appeal. Any person whose rights may be directly affected by the outcome of the appeal may file a request to intervene as provided in RSA 541-A:32. VI. On appeal, the council may affirm the decision of the department or may remand to the department with a determination that the decision complained of is unlawful or unreasonable. The council shall specify the factual and legal basis for its determination and shall identify the evidence in the record created before the council that supports its decision. VII. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the council may apply to the council for reconsideration as specified in RSA 541. VIII. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the council after reconsideration may appeal to the supreme court as specified in RSA 541. IX. In the case of a remand to the department by the council, the department may accept the council's determination and reissue a decision or order, imposing such conditions as are necessary and consistent with the purposes of this chapter, or may appeal as provided in paragraphs VII and VIII. X. [Repealed.] XI. [Repealed.] XII. [Repealed.] XIII. [Repealed.] XIV. [Repealed.] XV. [Repealed.] XVI. [Repealed.] XVII. [Repealed.] XVIII. If a permit is granted with respect to any activity proposed to be undertaken in or adjacent to a prime wetland as mapped, designated, and filed pursuant to RSA 482-A:15, the conservation commission or local governing body may request reconsideration by the department and, if aggrieved by the decision or reconsideration, appeal said decision to the wetlands council and the supreme court in the manner prescribed in this section. The filing of a request for reconsideration shall automatically stay the effectiveness of the department's decision relating to said prime wetland. Said stay shall remain in force until the department has issued its decision after reconsideration.
Source. 1989, 339:1. 1991, 20:5. 1996, 296:45, eff. Aug. 9, 1996. 2004, 2:2, 3, eff. Mar. 5, 2004; 243:3, eff. July 1, 2004. 2008, 171:6, 7, 16, eff. July 1, 2008; 363:5, eff. Sept. 9, 2008.
I. Any person aggrieved by a decision made by the department under RSA 482-A:3 may apply for reconsideration by the department, and then may appeal to the wetlands council and to the supreme court as provided in this section. A person aggrieved under this section shall mean the applicant and any person required to be noticed by mail in accordance with RSA 482-A:8 and RSA 482-A:9. I-a. Any person subject to an order of the department under RSA 482-A:6 may appeal to the wetlands council and to the supreme court as provided in this section. The appellant shall not first request reconsideration, but shall file the appeal directly with the council as provided in paragraph IV, within 30 days of the date of the order. II. A request for reconsideration of a department decision under RSA 482-A:3 shall be filed with the department within 30 days of issuance of the department's decision. The request for reconsideration shall describe in detail each ground for the request for reconsideration. III. On reconsideration, the department shall receive and consider any new and additional evidence presented, and shall make findings of fact and rulings of law in support of its decision after reconsideration. The department may hold a public hearing in accordance with its rules. Reconsideration hearings shall not be subject to the requirements of RSA 541-A. Reconsideration hearings shall be noticed in accordance with rules adopted by the department, which notice shall be sent to all persons entitled to notice of applications under RSA 482-A:8 and RSA 482-A:9, and the department shall make a record of the proceedings. The department shall grant or deny the request for reconsideration within 30 days of the department's receipt of the request or explain in writing to the applicant why the request cannot be acted on and a statement of the time reasonably necessary to act on the request. However, if the basis for denial includes failure by the applicant to submit all requested information and the applicant submits all of the requested information with the request for reconsideration, the department shall act on the request within 75 days from the date of the department's receipt of the request for projects where the applicant proposes under one acre of jurisdictional impact, and within 105 days for all other projects. IV. An appeal from a decision of the department under RSA 482-A:3 after reconsideration, or an appeal from an order issued by the department under RSA 482-A:6, shall be filed with the wetlands council within 30 days of the department's decision or order. An appeal shall be considered timely filed and received by the wetlands council if postmarked or hand delivered to the wetlands council on or before the thirtieth day from the date of the department's decision. Filing of the appeal shall be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the wetlands council, with a copy sent to the department. An appeal to the council shall contain a detailed description of the land involved in the department's decision and shall set forth fully every ground upon which it is claimed that the decision complained of is unlawful or unreasonable. Only those grounds set forth in the appeal shall be considered by the council. V. The council on appeal shall hold an adjudicative hearing as provided in RSA 541-A and the council's rules. The hearing shall be noticed in accordance with RSA 541-A:31, III. For appeals of department decisions under RSA 482-A:3, the notice shall also be sent to all persons entitled to notice of applications under RSA 482-A:8 and RSA 482-A:9. The burden of proof shall be on the party seeking to set aside the department's decision to show that the decision is unlawful or unreasonable. On appeal of requests proposed, sponsored, or administered by the department of transportation, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that there is a public need for the requested project, and that the department of transportation has exercised appropriate engineering judgment in the project's design. All findings of the department upon all questions of fact properly before it shall be prima facie lawful and reasonable. V-a. Any person whose rights will be directly affected by the outcome of the appeal may appear and become a party to the appeal. Any person whose rights may be directly affected by the outcome of the appeal may file a request to intervene as provided in RSA 541-A:32. VI. On appeal, the council may affirm the decision of the department or may remand to the department with a determination that the decision complained of is unlawful or unreasonable. The council shall specify the factual and legal basis for its determination and shall identify the evidence in the record created before the council that supports its decision. VII. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the council may apply to the council for reconsideration as specified in RSA 541. VIII. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the council after reconsideration may appeal to the supreme court as specified in RSA 541. IX. In the case of a remand to the department by the council, the department may accept the council's determination and reissue a decision or order, imposing such conditions as are necessary and consistent with the purposes of this chapter, or may appeal as provided in paragraphs VII and VIII. X. [Repealed.] XI. [Repealed.] XII. [Repealed.] XIII. [Repealed.] XIV. [Repealed.] XV. [Repealed.] XVI. [Repealed.] XVII. [Repealed.] XVIII. If a permit is granted with respect to any activity proposed to be undertaken in or adjacent to a prime wetland as mapped, designated, and filed pursuant to RSA 482-A:15, the conservation commission or local governing body may request reconsideration by the department and, if aggrieved by the decision or reconsideration, appeal said decision to the wetlands council and the supreme court in the manner prescribed in this section. The filing of a request for reconsideration shall automatically stay the effectiveness of the department's decision relating to said prime wetland. Said stay shall remain in force until the department has issued its decision after reconsideration.
Source. 1989, 339:1. 1991, 20:5. 1996, 296:45, eff. Aug. 9, 1996. 2004, 2:2, 3, eff. Mar. 5, 2004; 243:3, eff. July 1, 2004. 2008, 171:6, 7, 16, eff. July 1, 2008; 363:5, eff. Sept. 9, 2008.
