Section 15-6-50(d) - Denial of motion for judgment as a matter of law. - South-dakota Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > South-dakota > Title-15 > Chapter-06 > Statute-15-6-50-d

15-6-50(d). Denial of motion for judgment as a matter of law. If the motion for judgment as a matter of law is denied, the party who prevailed on that motion may, as respondent, assert grounds entitling the party to a new trial in the event the Supreme Court concludes that the trial court erred in denying the motion for judgment. If the Supreme Court reverses the judgment, nothing in § 15-6-50 precludes it from determining that the respondent is entitled to a new trial, or from directing the trial court to determine whether a new trial shall be granted.

Source: SD RCP, Rule 50 (d), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; SL 2006, ch 321 (Supreme Court Rule 06-47), eff. July 1, 2006.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > South-dakota > Title-15 > Chapter-06 > Statute-15-6-50-d

15-6-50(d). Denial of motion for judgment as a matter of law. If the motion for judgment as a matter of law is denied, the party who prevailed on that motion may, as respondent, assert grounds entitling the party to a new trial in the event the Supreme Court concludes that the trial court erred in denying the motion for judgment. If the Supreme Court reverses the judgment, nothing in § 15-6-50 precludes it from determining that the respondent is entitled to a new trial, or from directing the trial court to determine whether a new trial shall be granted.

Source: SD RCP, Rule 50 (d), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; SL 2006, ch 321 (Supreme Court Rule 06-47), eff. July 1, 2006.

State Codes and Statutes

Back To Homepage

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > South-dakota > Title-15 > Chapter-06 > Statute-15-6-50-d

15-6-50(d). Denial of motion for judgment as a matter of law. If the motion for judgment as a matter of law is denied, the party who prevailed on that motion may, as respondent, assert grounds entitling the party to a new trial in the event the Supreme Court concludes that the trial court erred in denying the motion for judgment. If the Supreme Court reverses the judgment, nothing in § 15-6-50 precludes it from determining that the respondent is entitled to a new trial, or from directing the trial court to determine whether a new trial shall be granted.

Source: SD RCP, Rule 50 (d), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; SL 2006, ch 321 (Supreme Court Rule 06-47), eff. July 1, 2006.