State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-31a > Chapter-27a > 31a-27a-111

31A-27a-111. Actions by and against the receiver.
(1) (a) An allegation by the receiver of improper or fraudulent conduct against a personmay not be the basis of a defense to the enforcement of a contractual obligation owed to theinsurer by a third party.
(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (1)(a), a third party described in this Subsection (1) isnot barred by this section from seeking to establish independently as a defense that the conduct ismaterially and substantially related to the contractual obligation for which enforcement is sought.
(2) (a) Subject to Subsection (2)(b), a prior wrongful or negligent action of any present orformer officer, manager, director, trustee, owner, employee, or agent of the insurer may not beasserted as a defense to a claim by the receiver:
(i) under a theory of:
(A) estoppel;
(B) comparative fault;
(C) intervening cause;
(D) proximate cause;
(E) reliance; or
(F) mitigation of damages; or
(ii) otherwise.
(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (2)(a):
(i) the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement may be asserted against thereceiver in a claim based on a contract; and
(ii) a principal under a surety bond or a surety undertaking is entitled to credit against anyreimbursement obligation to the receiver for the value of any property pledged to secure thereimbursement obligation to the extent that:
(A) the receiver has possession or control of the property; or
(B) the insurer or its agents misappropriated, including commingling, the property.
(c) Evidence of fraud in the inducement is admissible only if it is contained in the recordsof the insurer.
(3) Action or inaction by an insurance regulatory authority may not be asserted as adefense to a claim by the receiver.
(4) (a) Subject to Subsection (4)(b), a judgment or order entered against an insured or theinsurer in contravention of a stay or injunction under this chapter, or at any time by default orcollusion, may not be considered as evidence of liability or of the quantum of damages inadjudicating claims filed in the estate arising out of the subject matter of the judgment or order.
(b) Subsection (4)(a) does not apply to an affected guaranty association's claim foramounts paid on a settlement or judgment in pursuit of the affected guaranty association'sstatutory obligations.
(5) The receiver may not be considered a governmental entity for the purposes of anystate law awarding fees to a litigant who prevails against a governmental entity.

Enacted by Chapter 309, 2007 General Session

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-31a > Chapter-27a > 31a-27a-111

31A-27a-111. Actions by and against the receiver.
(1) (a) An allegation by the receiver of improper or fraudulent conduct against a personmay not be the basis of a defense to the enforcement of a contractual obligation owed to theinsurer by a third party.
(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (1)(a), a third party described in this Subsection (1) isnot barred by this section from seeking to establish independently as a defense that the conduct ismaterially and substantially related to the contractual obligation for which enforcement is sought.
(2) (a) Subject to Subsection (2)(b), a prior wrongful or negligent action of any present orformer officer, manager, director, trustee, owner, employee, or agent of the insurer may not beasserted as a defense to a claim by the receiver:
(i) under a theory of:
(A) estoppel;
(B) comparative fault;
(C) intervening cause;
(D) proximate cause;
(E) reliance; or
(F) mitigation of damages; or
(ii) otherwise.
(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (2)(a):
(i) the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement may be asserted against thereceiver in a claim based on a contract; and
(ii) a principal under a surety bond or a surety undertaking is entitled to credit against anyreimbursement obligation to the receiver for the value of any property pledged to secure thereimbursement obligation to the extent that:
(A) the receiver has possession or control of the property; or
(B) the insurer or its agents misappropriated, including commingling, the property.
(c) Evidence of fraud in the inducement is admissible only if it is contained in the recordsof the insurer.
(3) Action or inaction by an insurance regulatory authority may not be asserted as adefense to a claim by the receiver.
(4) (a) Subject to Subsection (4)(b), a judgment or order entered against an insured or theinsurer in contravention of a stay or injunction under this chapter, or at any time by default orcollusion, may not be considered as evidence of liability or of the quantum of damages inadjudicating claims filed in the estate arising out of the subject matter of the judgment or order.
(b) Subsection (4)(a) does not apply to an affected guaranty association's claim foramounts paid on a settlement or judgment in pursuit of the affected guaranty association'sstatutory obligations.
(5) The receiver may not be considered a governmental entity for the purposes of anystate law awarding fees to a litigant who prevails against a governmental entity.

Enacted by Chapter 309, 2007 General Session


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-31a > Chapter-27a > 31a-27a-111

31A-27a-111. Actions by and against the receiver.
(1) (a) An allegation by the receiver of improper or fraudulent conduct against a personmay not be the basis of a defense to the enforcement of a contractual obligation owed to theinsurer by a third party.
(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (1)(a), a third party described in this Subsection (1) isnot barred by this section from seeking to establish independently as a defense that the conduct ismaterially and substantially related to the contractual obligation for which enforcement is sought.
(2) (a) Subject to Subsection (2)(b), a prior wrongful or negligent action of any present orformer officer, manager, director, trustee, owner, employee, or agent of the insurer may not beasserted as a defense to a claim by the receiver:
(i) under a theory of:
(A) estoppel;
(B) comparative fault;
(C) intervening cause;
(D) proximate cause;
(E) reliance; or
(F) mitigation of damages; or
(ii) otherwise.
(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (2)(a):
(i) the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement may be asserted against thereceiver in a claim based on a contract; and
(ii) a principal under a surety bond or a surety undertaking is entitled to credit against anyreimbursement obligation to the receiver for the value of any property pledged to secure thereimbursement obligation to the extent that:
(A) the receiver has possession or control of the property; or
(B) the insurer or its agents misappropriated, including commingling, the property.
(c) Evidence of fraud in the inducement is admissible only if it is contained in the recordsof the insurer.
(3) Action or inaction by an insurance regulatory authority may not be asserted as adefense to a claim by the receiver.
(4) (a) Subject to Subsection (4)(b), a judgment or order entered against an insured or theinsurer in contravention of a stay or injunction under this chapter, or at any time by default orcollusion, may not be considered as evidence of liability or of the quantum of damages inadjudicating claims filed in the estate arising out of the subject matter of the judgment or order.
(b) Subsection (4)(a) does not apply to an affected guaranty association's claim foramounts paid on a settlement or judgment in pursuit of the affected guaranty association'sstatutory obligations.
(5) The receiver may not be considered a governmental entity for the purposes of anystate law awarding fees to a litigant who prevails against a governmental entity.

Enacted by Chapter 309, 2007 General Session