State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-70a > Chapter-02a > 70a-2a-202

70A-2a-202. Final written expression -- Parol or extrinsic evidence.
Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or whichare otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreementwith respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of anyprior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement, but may be explained or supplemented:
(1) by course of dealing or usage of trade or by course of performance; and
(2) by evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to havebeen intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.

Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-70a > Chapter-02a > 70a-2a-202

70A-2a-202. Final written expression -- Parol or extrinsic evidence.
Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or whichare otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreementwith respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of anyprior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement, but may be explained or supplemented:
(1) by course of dealing or usage of trade or by course of performance; and
(2) by evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to havebeen intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.

Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-70a > Chapter-02a > 70a-2a-202

70A-2a-202. Final written expression -- Parol or extrinsic evidence.
Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or whichare otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreementwith respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of anyprior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement, but may be explained or supplemented:
(1) by course of dealing or usage of trade or by course of performance; and
(2) by evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to havebeen intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.

Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session