State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-77 > Chapter-10a > 77-10a-8

77-10a-8. Challenge of prospective grand jurors -- Failure to comply in selection ofjurors -- Remedies.
(1) The attorney general, county attorney, district attorney, or special prosecutor maychallenge:
(a) the array of grand jurors on the ground the grand jury was not selected, drawn, orsummoned in accordance with law; and
(b) an individual juror on the ground the juror is not legally qualified.
(2) Challenges shall be made before the administration of the oath to the jurors and shallbe tried to the court managing the grand jury.
(3) A motion to dismiss the indictment may be based on objections to the array or on thelack of legal qualification of an individual juror, if not previously determined upon challenge.
(4) In criminal cases the defendant or attorney for the state may move to dismiss theindictment or stay the proceedings on the ground of substantial failure to comply with this chapterin selecting the grand jury. However, he must do so before the voir dire examination begins orwithin seven days after the defendant or attorney for the state discovered or could havediscovered the grounds by the exercise of diligence, whichever is earlier, or the motion isconsidered waived.
(5) (a) Any motion filed under Subsection (1), (3), or (4) must contain a sworn statementof facts which, if true, would constitute a substantial failure to comply with the provisions of thischapter. The moving party may present in support of the motion the testimony of the clerk if heis available, any relevant records and papers used by the clerk that were not made public orotherwise available, and any other relevant evidence.
(b) If the managing judge determines there has been a substantial failure to comply withthe provisions of this chapter in selecting the grand jury, he shall stay the proceedings pending theselection of a grand jury in conformity with this chapter or dismiss the indictment, whichever isappropriate.
(6) (a) The procedures prescribed by this section are the exclusive means by which aparty accused of a crime or an attorney for the state may challenge any grand jury on the groundit was not selected in conformity with this chapter.
(b) An indictment may not be dismissed in any case on the ground that one or moremembers of the grand jury that returned the indictment were not legally qualified if it appearsfrom the record kept by the grand jury that eight or more jurors, after deducting the number notqualified, concurred in finding the indictment.

Amended by Chapter 38, 1993 General Session

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-77 > Chapter-10a > 77-10a-8

77-10a-8. Challenge of prospective grand jurors -- Failure to comply in selection ofjurors -- Remedies.
(1) The attorney general, county attorney, district attorney, or special prosecutor maychallenge:
(a) the array of grand jurors on the ground the grand jury was not selected, drawn, orsummoned in accordance with law; and
(b) an individual juror on the ground the juror is not legally qualified.
(2) Challenges shall be made before the administration of the oath to the jurors and shallbe tried to the court managing the grand jury.
(3) A motion to dismiss the indictment may be based on objections to the array or on thelack of legal qualification of an individual juror, if not previously determined upon challenge.
(4) In criminal cases the defendant or attorney for the state may move to dismiss theindictment or stay the proceedings on the ground of substantial failure to comply with this chapterin selecting the grand jury. However, he must do so before the voir dire examination begins orwithin seven days after the defendant or attorney for the state discovered or could havediscovered the grounds by the exercise of diligence, whichever is earlier, or the motion isconsidered waived.
(5) (a) Any motion filed under Subsection (1), (3), or (4) must contain a sworn statementof facts which, if true, would constitute a substantial failure to comply with the provisions of thischapter. The moving party may present in support of the motion the testimony of the clerk if heis available, any relevant records and papers used by the clerk that were not made public orotherwise available, and any other relevant evidence.
(b) If the managing judge determines there has been a substantial failure to comply withthe provisions of this chapter in selecting the grand jury, he shall stay the proceedings pending theselection of a grand jury in conformity with this chapter or dismiss the indictment, whichever isappropriate.
(6) (a) The procedures prescribed by this section are the exclusive means by which aparty accused of a crime or an attorney for the state may challenge any grand jury on the groundit was not selected in conformity with this chapter.
(b) An indictment may not be dismissed in any case on the ground that one or moremembers of the grand jury that returned the indictment were not legally qualified if it appearsfrom the record kept by the grand jury that eight or more jurors, after deducting the number notqualified, concurred in finding the indictment.

Amended by Chapter 38, 1993 General Session


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-77 > Chapter-10a > 77-10a-8

77-10a-8. Challenge of prospective grand jurors -- Failure to comply in selection ofjurors -- Remedies.
(1) The attorney general, county attorney, district attorney, or special prosecutor maychallenge:
(a) the array of grand jurors on the ground the grand jury was not selected, drawn, orsummoned in accordance with law; and
(b) an individual juror on the ground the juror is not legally qualified.
(2) Challenges shall be made before the administration of the oath to the jurors and shallbe tried to the court managing the grand jury.
(3) A motion to dismiss the indictment may be based on objections to the array or on thelack of legal qualification of an individual juror, if not previously determined upon challenge.
(4) In criminal cases the defendant or attorney for the state may move to dismiss theindictment or stay the proceedings on the ground of substantial failure to comply with this chapterin selecting the grand jury. However, he must do so before the voir dire examination begins orwithin seven days after the defendant or attorney for the state discovered or could havediscovered the grounds by the exercise of diligence, whichever is earlier, or the motion isconsidered waived.
(5) (a) Any motion filed under Subsection (1), (3), or (4) must contain a sworn statementof facts which, if true, would constitute a substantial failure to comply with the provisions of thischapter. The moving party may present in support of the motion the testimony of the clerk if heis available, any relevant records and papers used by the clerk that were not made public orotherwise available, and any other relevant evidence.
(b) If the managing judge determines there has been a substantial failure to comply withthe provisions of this chapter in selecting the grand jury, he shall stay the proceedings pending theselection of a grand jury in conformity with this chapter or dismiss the indictment, whichever isappropriate.
(6) (a) The procedures prescribed by this section are the exclusive means by which aparty accused of a crime or an attorney for the state may challenge any grand jury on the groundit was not selected in conformity with this chapter.
(b) An indictment may not be dismissed in any case on the ground that one or moremembers of the grand jury that returned the indictment were not legally qualified if it appearsfrom the record kept by the grand jury that eight or more jurors, after deducting the number notqualified, concurred in finding the indictment.

Amended by Chapter 38, 1993 General Session