State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-77 > Chapter-15 > 77-15-6-5

77-15-6.5. Petition for involuntary medication of incompetent defendant.
(1) As used in this section:
(a) "Executive director" means the executive director of the Department of HumanServices or the executive director's designee.
(b) "Final order" means a court order that determines the rights of the parties andconcerning which appellate remedies have been exhausted or the time for appeal has expired.
(2) (a) At any time after a defendant has been found incompetent to proceed and has beencommitted to the Department of Human Services under Section 77-15-6 for treatment to restorecompetency, the executive director shall notify the court, prosecuting attorney, and attorney forthe defendant if the executive director has determined that the defendant is not responding totreatment and is unlikely to be restored to competency without the involuntary administration ofantipsychotic medication.
(b) The executive director shall provide the notification under Subsection (2)(a) only ifthere is no basis for involuntarily medicating the defendant for reasons other than to restore thedefendant's competency.
(3) In the notice under Subsection (2)(a), the executive director shall state whether theexecutive director believes:
(a) medication is necessary to render the defendant competent;
(b) medication is substantially likely to render the defendant competent;
(c) medication is substantially unlikely to produce side effects which would significantlyinterfere with the defendant's ability to assist in his defense;
(d) no less intrusive means are available, and whether any of those means have beenattempted to render the defendant competent; and
(e) medication is medically appropriate and is in the defendant's best medical interest inlight of his medical condition.
(4) (a) Upon receipt of the notice under Subsection (2)(a), the court shall conduct ahearing within 30 days, unless the court extends the time for good cause, to determine whetherthe court should convene a hearing regarding the involuntary medication of the defendant.
(b) The prosecuting attorney shall represent the state at any hearing under this section.
(c) The court shall consider whether the following factors apply in determining whetherthe defendant should be involuntarily medicated:
(i) important state interests are at stake in restoring the defendant's competency;
(ii) involuntary medication will significantly further the important state interests, in thatthe medication proposed:
(A) is substantially likely to render the defendant competent to stand trial; and
(B) is substantially unlikely to produce side effects which would significantly interferewith the defendant's ability to assist the defense counsel in conducting his defense;
(iii) involuntary medication is necessary to further important state interests, because anyalternate less intrusive treatments are unlikely to achieve substantially the same results; and
(iv) the administration of the proposed medication is medically appropriate, as it is in thedefendant's best medical interest in light of his medical condition.
(5) In determining whether the proposed treatment is medically appropriate and is in thedefendant's best medical interest, the potential penalty the defendant may be subject to, if thedefendant is convicted of any charged offense, is not a relevant consideration.
(6) (a) If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the involuntary

administration of antipsychotic medication is appropriate, it shall make findings addressing eachof the factors in Subsection (4)(c) and shall issue an order authorizing the Department of HumanServices to involuntarily administer antipsychotic medication to the defendant in order to restorehis competency, subject to the periodic reviews and other procedures provided in Section77-15-6.
(b) When issuing an order under Subsection (6)(a), the court shall consider ordering lessintrusive means for administering the drugs, such as a court order to the defendant enforceable bythe contempt power, before ordering more intrusive methods of involuntary medication.
(7) The provisions in Section 77-15-6 establishing time limitations for treatment ofincompetent defendants before they must be either released or civilly committed are tolled fromthe time the executive director gives notice to the court and the parties under Subsection (2) until:
(a) the court has issued a final order for the involuntary medication of the defendant, andthe defendant has been medicated under that order; or
(b) the court has issued a final order that the defendant will not be involuntarilymedicated.
(8) This section applies only when the prosecution seeks an order of involuntarymedication solely for the purpose of rendering a defendant competent to proceed.

Amended by Chapter 212, 2008 General Session

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-77 > Chapter-15 > 77-15-6-5

77-15-6.5. Petition for involuntary medication of incompetent defendant.
(1) As used in this section:
(a) "Executive director" means the executive director of the Department of HumanServices or the executive director's designee.
(b) "Final order" means a court order that determines the rights of the parties andconcerning which appellate remedies have been exhausted or the time for appeal has expired.
(2) (a) At any time after a defendant has been found incompetent to proceed and has beencommitted to the Department of Human Services under Section 77-15-6 for treatment to restorecompetency, the executive director shall notify the court, prosecuting attorney, and attorney forthe defendant if the executive director has determined that the defendant is not responding totreatment and is unlikely to be restored to competency without the involuntary administration ofantipsychotic medication.
(b) The executive director shall provide the notification under Subsection (2)(a) only ifthere is no basis for involuntarily medicating the defendant for reasons other than to restore thedefendant's competency.
(3) In the notice under Subsection (2)(a), the executive director shall state whether theexecutive director believes:
(a) medication is necessary to render the defendant competent;
(b) medication is substantially likely to render the defendant competent;
(c) medication is substantially unlikely to produce side effects which would significantlyinterfere with the defendant's ability to assist in his defense;
(d) no less intrusive means are available, and whether any of those means have beenattempted to render the defendant competent; and
(e) medication is medically appropriate and is in the defendant's best medical interest inlight of his medical condition.
(4) (a) Upon receipt of the notice under Subsection (2)(a), the court shall conduct ahearing within 30 days, unless the court extends the time for good cause, to determine whetherthe court should convene a hearing regarding the involuntary medication of the defendant.
(b) The prosecuting attorney shall represent the state at any hearing under this section.
(c) The court shall consider whether the following factors apply in determining whetherthe defendant should be involuntarily medicated:
(i) important state interests are at stake in restoring the defendant's competency;
(ii) involuntary medication will significantly further the important state interests, in thatthe medication proposed:
(A) is substantially likely to render the defendant competent to stand trial; and
(B) is substantially unlikely to produce side effects which would significantly interferewith the defendant's ability to assist the defense counsel in conducting his defense;
(iii) involuntary medication is necessary to further important state interests, because anyalternate less intrusive treatments are unlikely to achieve substantially the same results; and
(iv) the administration of the proposed medication is medically appropriate, as it is in thedefendant's best medical interest in light of his medical condition.
(5) In determining whether the proposed treatment is medically appropriate and is in thedefendant's best medical interest, the potential penalty the defendant may be subject to, if thedefendant is convicted of any charged offense, is not a relevant consideration.
(6) (a) If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the involuntary

administration of antipsychotic medication is appropriate, it shall make findings addressing eachof the factors in Subsection (4)(c) and shall issue an order authorizing the Department of HumanServices to involuntarily administer antipsychotic medication to the defendant in order to restorehis competency, subject to the periodic reviews and other procedures provided in Section77-15-6.
(b) When issuing an order under Subsection (6)(a), the court shall consider ordering lessintrusive means for administering the drugs, such as a court order to the defendant enforceable bythe contempt power, before ordering more intrusive methods of involuntary medication.
(7) The provisions in Section 77-15-6 establishing time limitations for treatment ofincompetent defendants before they must be either released or civilly committed are tolled fromthe time the executive director gives notice to the court and the parties under Subsection (2) until:
(a) the court has issued a final order for the involuntary medication of the defendant, andthe defendant has been medicated under that order; or
(b) the court has issued a final order that the defendant will not be involuntarilymedicated.
(8) This section applies only when the prosecution seeks an order of involuntarymedication solely for the purpose of rendering a defendant competent to proceed.

Amended by Chapter 212, 2008 General Session


State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > Utah > Title-77 > Chapter-15 > 77-15-6-5

77-15-6.5. Petition for involuntary medication of incompetent defendant.
(1) As used in this section:
(a) "Executive director" means the executive director of the Department of HumanServices or the executive director's designee.
(b) "Final order" means a court order that determines the rights of the parties andconcerning which appellate remedies have been exhausted or the time for appeal has expired.
(2) (a) At any time after a defendant has been found incompetent to proceed and has beencommitted to the Department of Human Services under Section 77-15-6 for treatment to restorecompetency, the executive director shall notify the court, prosecuting attorney, and attorney forthe defendant if the executive director has determined that the defendant is not responding totreatment and is unlikely to be restored to competency without the involuntary administration ofantipsychotic medication.
(b) The executive director shall provide the notification under Subsection (2)(a) only ifthere is no basis for involuntarily medicating the defendant for reasons other than to restore thedefendant's competency.
(3) In the notice under Subsection (2)(a), the executive director shall state whether theexecutive director believes:
(a) medication is necessary to render the defendant competent;
(b) medication is substantially likely to render the defendant competent;
(c) medication is substantially unlikely to produce side effects which would significantlyinterfere with the defendant's ability to assist in his defense;
(d) no less intrusive means are available, and whether any of those means have beenattempted to render the defendant competent; and
(e) medication is medically appropriate and is in the defendant's best medical interest inlight of his medical condition.
(4) (a) Upon receipt of the notice under Subsection (2)(a), the court shall conduct ahearing within 30 days, unless the court extends the time for good cause, to determine whetherthe court should convene a hearing regarding the involuntary medication of the defendant.
(b) The prosecuting attorney shall represent the state at any hearing under this section.
(c) The court shall consider whether the following factors apply in determining whetherthe defendant should be involuntarily medicated:
(i) important state interests are at stake in restoring the defendant's competency;
(ii) involuntary medication will significantly further the important state interests, in thatthe medication proposed:
(A) is substantially likely to render the defendant competent to stand trial; and
(B) is substantially unlikely to produce side effects which would significantly interferewith the defendant's ability to assist the defense counsel in conducting his defense;
(iii) involuntary medication is necessary to further important state interests, because anyalternate less intrusive treatments are unlikely to achieve substantially the same results; and
(iv) the administration of the proposed medication is medically appropriate, as it is in thedefendant's best medical interest in light of his medical condition.
(5) In determining whether the proposed treatment is medically appropriate and is in thedefendant's best medical interest, the potential penalty the defendant may be subject to, if thedefendant is convicted of any charged offense, is not a relevant consideration.
(6) (a) If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the involuntary

administration of antipsychotic medication is appropriate, it shall make findings addressing eachof the factors in Subsection (4)(c) and shall issue an order authorizing the Department of HumanServices to involuntarily administer antipsychotic medication to the defendant in order to restorehis competency, subject to the periodic reviews and other procedures provided in Section77-15-6.
(b) When issuing an order under Subsection (6)(a), the court shall consider ordering lessintrusive means for administering the drugs, such as a court order to the defendant enforceable bythe contempt power, before ordering more intrusive methods of involuntary medication.
(7) The provisions in Section 77-15-6 establishing time limitations for treatment ofincompetent defendants before they must be either released or civilly committed are tolled fromthe time the executive director gives notice to the court and the parties under Subsection (2) until:
(a) the court has issued a final order for the involuntary medication of the defendant, andthe defendant has been medicated under that order; or
(b) the court has issued a final order that the defendant will not be involuntarilymedicated.
(8) This section applies only when the prosecution seeks an order of involuntarymedication solely for the purpose of rendering a defendant competent to proceed.

Amended by Chapter 212, 2008 General Session