§291D-8  Hearings.  (a)  In
proceedings to contest a notice of traffic infraction where the person to whom
the notice was issued has timely requested a hearing and appears at such
hearing:



(1)  In lieu of the personal appearance by the officer
who issued the notice of traffic infraction, the court shall consider the
notice of traffic infraction and any other written report made by the officer,
if provided to the court by the officer, together with any oral or written
statement by the person to whom the notice of infraction was issued, or in the
case of traffic infractions involving parking or equipment, the operator or
registered owner of the motor vehicle;



(2)  The court may compel by subpoena the attendance
of the officer who issued the notice of traffic infraction and other witnesses
from whom it may wish to hear;



(3)  The standard of proof to be applied by the court
shall be whether, by a preponderance of the evidence, the court finds that the
traffic infraction was committed; and



(4)  After due consideration of the evidence and
arguments, if any, the court shall determine whether commission of the traffic
infraction has been established.  Where the commission of the traffic
infraction has not been established, judgment in favor of the defendant, dismissing
the notice of traffic infraction or any count therein with prejudice, shall be
entered in the record.  Where it has been established that the traffic
infraction was committed, the court shall enter judgment in favor of the State
and shall assess a monetary assessment pursuant to section 291D-9, together
with any fees, surcharges, or costs.  The court also shall inform the person of
the right to request a trial pursuant to section 291D-13.  If the person
requests a trial at the time of the hearing, the court shall provide the person
with the trial date as soon as practicable.



(b)  In proceedings to explain mitigating
circumstances where the person to whom the notice of traffic infraction was
issued has timely requested a hearing and appears at such hearing:



(1)  The procedure shall be limited to the issue of
mitigating circumstances.  A person who requests to explain the circumstances
shall not be permitted to contest the notice of traffic infraction;



(2)  After the court has received the explanation, the
court shall enter judgment in favor of the State and may assess a monetary
assessment pursuant to section 291D-9, together with any fees, surcharges, or
costs;



(3)  The court, after receiving the explanation, may
vacate the admission and enter judgment in favor of the defendant, dismissing
the notice of traffic infraction or any count therein with prejudice, where the
explanation establishes that the infraction was not committed; and



(4)  There shall be no appeal from the judgment.



(c)  If a person for whom a hearing has been
scheduled, to contest the notice of traffic infraction or to explain mitigating
circumstances, fails to appear at the hearing, the court shall enter judgment
by default for the State and take action as provided in section 291D-7(e).  If
the total amount of the monetary assessment, fees, surcharges, or costs is not
paid within thirty days of entry of default judgment, the court shall take
action as provided in section 291D-10. [L 1993, c 214, pt of §2; am L 1997, c
60, §11; am L 2007, c 85, §7]



 



Rules of Court



 



  Hearings, see HCTR rules 11, 14; subpoenas, see HCTR rule 13.



  Default judgments, see HCTR rule 15; motion to set aside, see
HCTR rule 18(b).