36-20-4 - Review of rules -- Criteria.
36-20-4. Review of rules -- Criteria.
The committee shall review and evaluate submissions of court rules or proposals for courtrules and may review existing court rules, based on the following criteria:
(1) whether or not they are authorized by the state constitution or by statute;
(2) whether or not those authorized by statute comply with legislative intent;
(3) whether or not they are in conflict with existing statute or govern the same policy asarticulated in statute;
(4) whether or not they are primarily substantive or procedural in nature;
(5) whether or not they infringe upon the powers of the executive or legislative branch ofgovernment;
(6) their impact on affected persons;
(7) their purpose or the reason for the change;
(8) the anticipated cost or savings to:
(a) the state budget;
(b) local governments; and
(c) individuals; and
(9) the compliance cost for affected persons.
The committee shall review and evaluate submissions of court rules or proposals for courtrules and may review existing court rules, based on the following criteria:
(1) whether or not they are authorized by the state constitution or by statute;
(2) whether or not those authorized by statute comply with legislative intent;
(3) whether or not they are in conflict with existing statute or govern the same policy asarticulated in statute;
(4) whether or not they are primarily substantive or procedural in nature;
(5) whether or not they infringe upon the powers of the executive or legislative branch ofgovernment;
(6) their impact on affected persons;
(7) their purpose or the reason for the change;
(8) the anticipated cost or savings to:
(a) the state budget;
(b) local governments; and
(c) individuals; and
(9) the compliance cost for affected persons.
Enacted by Chapter 282, 1993 General Session