§  76-f.  Inconvenient  forum.  1.  A  court  of  this state which has  jurisdiction under this article to make a  child  custody  determination  may  decline  to  exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it determines  that it is an inconvenient forum under  the  circumstances  and  that  a  court  of  another  state  is  a  more  appropriate  forum. The issue of  inconvenient forum may be raised upon motion of a party,  the  child  or  the  child's  attorney,  or  upon  the court's own motion, or request of  another court. 2. Before determining whether it is an inconvenient forum, a court  of  this  state  shall  consider  whether  it  is appropriate for a court of  another state to exercise jurisdiction.  For  this  purpose,  the  court  shall  allow  the  parties  to submit information and shall consider all  relevant factors, including: (a) whether domestic violence or mistreatment or abuse of a  child  or  sibling  has  occurred and is likely to continue in the future and which  state could best protect the parties and the child; (b) the length of time the child has resided outside this state; (c) the distance between the court in this state and the court in  the  state that would assume jurisdiction; (d) the relative financial circumstances of the parties; (e)  any  agreement  of  the  parties  as to which state should assume  jurisdiction; (f) the nature and location of the evidence required  to  resolve  the  pending litigation, including testimony of the child; (g)  the  ability  of  the  court  of  each  state to decide the issue  expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present the evidence; and (h) the familiarity of the court of each  state  with  the  facts  and  issues in the pending litigation. 3.  If  a  court  of  this state determines that it is an inconvenient  forum and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum,  it  shall stay  the  proceedings  upon  condition  that  a  child  custody  proceeding be promptly commenced in another  designated  state  and  may  impose any other condition the court considers just and proper. 4.  A  court  of  this  state may decline to exercise its jurisdiction  under this article if a child custody determination is incidental to  an  action for divorce  or  another  proceeding  while  still  retaining  jurisdiction over the divorce or other proceeding.