State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > New-york > Gbs > Article-9 > 92

§  92.  Erroneous  bills  of lading or receipts, issued in good faith,  excepted. No person can be convicted of an offense under  the  last  two  sections,  for  the  reason  that the contents of any barrel, box, case,  cask or other vessel or package mentioned in the bill of lading, receipt  or other voucher did not correspond with the description given  in  such  instrument  of  merchandise  received,  if  such description corresponds  substantially with the marks, labels or brands upon the outside of  such  vessel  or  package, unless it appears that the defendant knew that such  marks, labels or brands were untrue.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > New-york > Gbs > Article-9 > 92

§  92.  Erroneous  bills  of lading or receipts, issued in good faith,  excepted. No person can be convicted of an offense under  the  last  two  sections,  for  the  reason  that the contents of any barrel, box, case,  cask or other vessel or package mentioned in the bill of lading, receipt  or other voucher did not correspond with the description given  in  such  instrument  of  merchandise  received,  if  such description corresponds  substantially with the marks, labels or brands upon the outside of  such  vessel  or  package, unless it appears that the defendant knew that such  marks, labels or brands were untrue.

State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > New-york > Gbs > Article-9 > 92

§  92.  Erroneous  bills  of lading or receipts, issued in good faith,  excepted. No person can be convicted of an offense under  the  last  two  sections,  for  the  reason  that the contents of any barrel, box, case,  cask or other vessel or package mentioned in the bill of lading, receipt  or other voucher did not correspond with the description given  in  such  instrument  of  merchandise  received,  if  such description corresponds  substantially with the marks, labels or brands upon the outside of  such  vessel  or  package, unless it appears that the defendant knew that such  marks, labels or brands were untrue.