State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > New-york > Jud > Article-20 > 795

§  795.  Liability  of  sheriff for omission of duty. An action may be  maintained, in behalf of the  people,  against  a  sheriff,  to  whom  a  warrant  is  directed  and  delivered, as prescribed in this article, to  recover damages for any omission of duty with respect to the same, in  a  case  where  a  judgment  creditor  might  maintain  an action against a  sheriff, to whom an  execution  issued  out  of  the  supreme  court  is  directed  and  delivered.  In such an action, the people are entitled to  recover the same damages, which a judgment creditor would be entitled to  recover, if the order imposing the fine was a judgment  of  the  supreme  court.

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > New-york > Jud > Article-20 > 795

§  795.  Liability  of  sheriff for omission of duty. An action may be  maintained, in behalf of the  people,  against  a  sheriff,  to  whom  a  warrant  is  directed  and  delivered, as prescribed in this article, to  recover damages for any omission of duty with respect to the same, in  a  case  where  a  judgment  creditor  might  maintain  an action against a  sheriff, to whom an  execution  issued  out  of  the  supreme  court  is  directed  and  delivered.  In such an action, the people are entitled to  recover the same damages, which a judgment creditor would be entitled to  recover, if the order imposing the fine was a judgment  of  the  supreme  court.

State Codes and Statutes

State Codes and Statutes

Statutes > New-york > Jud > Article-20 > 795

§  795.  Liability  of  sheriff for omission of duty. An action may be  maintained, in behalf of the  people,  against  a  sheriff,  to  whom  a  warrant  is  directed  and  delivered, as prescribed in this article, to  recover damages for any omission of duty with respect to the same, in  a  case  where  a  judgment  creditor  might  maintain  an action against a  sheriff, to whom an  execution  issued  out  of  the  supreme  court  is  directed  and  delivered.  In such an action, the people are entitled to  recover the same damages, which a judgment creditor would be entitled to  recover, if the order imposing the fine was a judgment  of  the  supreme  court.